Ottawa Citizen

The end of the transmissi­on dipstick in automatics may not be a bad move

Many drivers don’t understand how to correctly measure fluid, says Brian Turner.

- Driving.ca

De-contenting is a euphemism coined a number of years back to describe automakers’ pennypinch­ing in the manufactur­e of their products. Think of things like no clear coat on body surfaces that can’t be seen, such as door jambs.

Some automakers took it as far as only using a coloured tint applicatio­n instead of true colour paint, meaning, they could use the same tint to inexpensiv­ely treat several different compliment­ary shades of exterior colour. And there’s things such as deleting manual lock cylinders from the front passenger-side door. Items like this can save a few dollars per vehicle made, and that’s a lot of coin in a massproduc­tion factory. One of these famous — or infamous — moves was the deletion of the lowly automatic transmissi­on dipstick.

DIY maintenanc­e types have bemoaned the loss of a way to easily check automatic transmissi­on fluid levels, but this device wasn’t only removed to save a few pennies. Not every driver knows how to correctly measure automatic transmissi­on fluid, and adding too much fluid can do just as much, if not more, damage to a transmissi­on that’s running low. Excess fluid tends to create foam, which doesn’t do much for allowing internal clutches to grab correctly. It can also create overflows out of the dipstick tube.

Then there’s the seemingly illogical situation where most automatics are required to have their engines running and be fully warmed up before a correct level can be measured. Some require the driver to cycle the shifter through each gear position and then return it to Park before checking the level. Of course, all automatic gearboxes needed to have their vehicles on a completely level surface to get an accurate reading. So if you don’t have a dipstick, what do you do?

Different vehicles offer different solutions. Some still use a dipstick tube and the dipstick itself is available as a manufactur­er-specified tool. These can be ordered through an authorized dealership and some automakers have farmed this out to a third party. For instance, Fiat Chrysler uses Snap-on tools.

Others use either fill-andcheck plugs, mounted on the side of the transmissi­on case, or require a short and rigid metal rod to be fitted into its correspond­ing check-plug hole on the case. These setups aren’t easily accessed with vehicles on the ground, and usually requires them to be on a hoist (read: not DIY-friendly). And just to make things more fun, certain transmissi­ons, such as CVTs, can only have their fluid level verified by an electronic scanner.

If you’ve given up, you’re not alone. You should make sure your regular mechanic has the equipment and know-how to verify your transmissi­on’s fluid level during routine services. It’s not only a matter of ensuring the level is correct, but getting a regular report on the fluid’s condition.

An experience­d tech can tell a lot about what’s happening inside your vehicle’s gearbox just by the colour, smell, and condition of the fluid. This is critical for reliable operation, even on those newer transmissi­ons that are labelled “lifetime fill” or where no regular changes are required.

Finally, these dipstick-less units have pretty much put the kibosh on driving a unit with a small fluid leak that could be topped up from time to time. It’s pretty much fix-it-or-park-it when the dipstick is gone.

 ?? CLAYTON SEAMS/DRIVING ?? Let’s be honest: Do you really need a dipstick with an automatic transmissi­on these days?
CLAYTON SEAMS/DRIVING Let’s be honest: Do you really need a dipstick with an automatic transmissi­on these days?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada