Ottawa Citizen

Multi-use trail plan should include ATVs

-

I agree with the idea of a multiuse plan because it allows all users to enjoy the trail. I fail to see much difference in an ATV passing a pedestrian at 20 km/ h versus a bicycle passing at 20 km/ h. My nine-year-old and 11-year-old share that view. Kids walk to school every day with cars passing them at double or more that speed, and it is accepted as safe.

We do not have a serious problem with dangerousl­y operated ATVs in our town, so there is not a current negative precedent. ATVs are allowed on most roads in our town and yet there is very little ATV traffic, especially near urban areas. I would speculate the trail would not be extremely busy.

Given that ATV travel is mainly a daytime activity, I would also speculate nighttime traffic would be minimal. ATVs operated at the suggested speed limits would make noise comparable to a car. My bedroom window is about 400 metres from the trail through an open field and I do not worry about noise.

The mayor has stated that ATV riders are “scofflaws.” How can the leader of our local government feel it is OK to insult his constituen­ts and others? This is a public trail which I feel should be accessible to all members of the public. I believe our mayor owes our town an apology for his prejudices. We need to work together to achieve a fair outcome for all.

Keith Lowry, Almonte

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada