Ottawa Citizen

If you insult the king, be prepared to spend some time in the clink

- SHANNON GORMLEY Shannon Gormley is an Ottawa Citizen global affairs columnist and freelance journalist.

In the event that you occasional­ly entertain notions of giving obscure European royals a piece of your mind, you might take pause to consider this: In the Netherland­s, to insult the king is now to commit a crime punishable by up to four months in prison. This change in law, passed in the lower house last week, might embolden rather than deter you, however, as it is more rather than less lenient. Insulting a Dutch monarch was previously punishable by up to five years.

Yes, fine, Long Live the King, etc. But die fast and die forever, lèse-majesté!

That it is still a crime to impugn the character of heads of several European states is less a testament to the endurance of the Crown than to the stamina of basically any idea born at a time when you could be ushered into an amphitheat­re and invited to play with lions as your reward for treason. One wasn’t allowed to insult the Roman emperor; therefore, one mustn’t make fun of the House of Orange even though it’s called the House of Orange.

I only hope one is allowed to remark upon the fact that those places widely reputed for progressiv­ism are the very places where one is not allowed to speak ill of white people ordained by God to sit at the front of rooms in gold chairs. The Netherland­s! And Iceland! And Denmark! And Spain! … OK, perhaps Spain makes a bit of sense. But Denmark?

Now, some countries are slightly more generous than those: not to their citizens, to be sure, but to visiting heads of state. Italy and Poland think it more dignified to outlaw offences to His Majesty than to One’s Own Majesty. Such as, in Poland, the Pope. And Vladimir Putin, who in some circles in Poland may as well be the Pope. When Turkey’s Erdogan demanded that a German comedian be prosecuted under just this sort of law, the prosecutio­n was eventually dropped along with the law.

Again: The wonder is that any of these laws are still around to drop. The justificat­ion for their existence has, however, changed. Where once Roman emperors were effectivel­y Gods, and Gods having the generally observed right to smite thee for being rude about them, the justificat­ion for lèse-majesté now lies in the weakness rather than the strength of royals: They are regarded as so incapable of defending themselves against verbal and cartoonize­d attacks that the law must defend them.

So argued Dutch conservati­ves as they pushed to preserve prison penalties for royal insults: The king is not free to speak his mind about everything; the king ’s subjects, then, should not be free to speak their minds about the king.

Well, no. Norms prevent royals from defending themselves in certain ways, and norms prevent us, the unwashed masses, from attacking them in certain ways. If a cartoonist violates them in a too-scatologic­ally-inclined manner, he will be subject to social sanctions; if a royal violates them in a not-passive-aggressive-enough manner, he too will be sanctioned. Whatever the offender’s station, his offences will not result in his being locked up for meanness.

For proof of the exquisite beauty that can come of a quid pro quo arrangemen­t between mutually hostile parties, consider the Queen’s royal representa­tive in Canada: Julie Payette, a former astronaut and current Governor General, who, if only her resumé could speak for itself, would give us nothing negative to say. Fortunatel­y, she has been left to her own devices. When she recently delivered a stark warning about the dangers of horoscopes, Canadians, delivered words of their own.

No one called for anyone to go to prison, even if some Canadians did tell the Governor General to go somewhere at least as oppressive. All remain free to say the wrong thing, and thankfully so. It was all a nicely benign diversion, which, though that is hardly the only function of the monarchy, is certainly one of them. (The United Kingdom, by the way, once had laws against insulting the royals, but has since dispensed, presumably to the relief of tabloids.)

Europe still affords monarchs a reverence that Canadians usually reserve only for Europe. On this matter, it should emulate us.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada