Ottawa Citizen

TRACKING LRT ISSUES

Chiarelli says oversight of $2.1B project not possible without seeing full reports

- JON WILLING jwilling@postmedia.com twitter.com/JonathanWi­lling

Secrecy hinders oversight

At least one returning councillor will keep hounding city hall next term to release more informatio­n to the public — or at least to politician­s — on the $2.1-billion Confederat­ion Line LRT. “It has severe financial implicatio­ns and it also has safety implicatio­ns,” Coun. Rick Chiarelli said, arguing that council has a duty to protect the public. “Whenever you have a lack of oversight, you risk significan­t shenanigan­s.” Ken Rubin, a local researcher whose expertise is finding informatio­n in public institutio­ns, has been trying to pull more documents out of the city government related to the LRT project, the largest infrastruc­ture endeavour in the city’s history. In an opinion piece published Thursday, Rubin says the city has identified thousands of records produced by the transporta­tion department detailing observatio­ns about the underconst­ruction project. However, getting those records could cost big money, take a long time and potentiall­y have parts redacted under provisions of the Municipal Freedom of Informatio­n and Protection of Privacy Act. Rubin has an important LRT-related decision from the Informatio­n and Privacy Commission­er of Ontario under his belt. When he fought to receive “non-conformanc­e” reports on the constructi­on, an adjudicato­r underscore­d the public interest of the project and ordered most records released. Chiarelli, who won re-election, said the city should be releasing more LRT records to the public. “In municipal government, everything is public unless it falls into one of the exceptions. Some of it might, but most of it doesn’t fall into any of the exceptions,” Chiarelli said. “I’ll tell you what’s worse than that: If informatio­n is to be kept secret, it’s still supposed to be shown to council. Conducting oversight is one of the primary responsibi­lities of councillor­s.” One of the reasons a municipali­ty can refuse the release of informatio­n is the threat of hurting its economic or financial interests. Chiarelli hasn’t been able to get his hands on city-held informatio­n on land purchases associated with the first phase of LRT. He failed through motions at council. Council, including Chiarelli, voted in March 2012 to see LRT real estate deals only after all the properties have been secured. While the first phase is almost done, LRT constructi­on will last several more years as the city extends the tracks. Now, awkwardly, Chiarelli is in a battle with the corporatio­n he helps to oversee over the release of the informatio­n. Chiarelli has to go to mediation with the City of Ottawa through the Informatio­n and Privacy Commission­er of Ontario over his access to informatio­n request for land transactio­n details. He expects the mediation to happen within two weeks. The city has been flooded with LRT-related informatio­n requests in recent years, which shouldn’t be surprising for the largest project in its history. People have asked for briefing notes to municipal officials, records of LRT-branded merchandis­e, correspond­ence about health and safety in the tunnel, inspection reports on the constructi­on, the soil conditions around Rideau Station in the wake of 2016 sinkhole, and much more. There has been a public hunger to understand the quality, financial health and progress of the project. More informatio­n could be released at a finance and economic developmen­t committee meeting on Nov. 6.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada