Ottawa Citizen

WATCHDOG RULING

Darouze should apologize

- In making those recommenda­tions to council, the integrity commission­er has decided Darouze shouldn’t suffer a financial penalty. jwilling@postmedia.com twitter.com/JonathanWi­lling JON WILLING

City hall’s independen­t integrity watchdog has found that Osgoode Coun. George Darouze broke council’s code of conduct when he bullied constituen­ts after a Facebook dust-up last year.

Darouze will keep his job and isn’t likely to suffer financial penalties, but integrity commission­er Robert Marleau is recommendi­ng that the councillor apologize.

There are two Osgoode-based complainan­ts in the conduct case: a woman and her husband, who is an Ottawa Police Services officer. They aren’t identified in the investigat­ive report.

The integrity commission­er received the complaint on March 12, 2019 and, while he offered to resolve the issue informally, the complainan­ts wanted a full investigat­ion.

An investigat­or hired by the integrity commission­er collected sworn evidence from eight witnesses after beginning the probe on May 1.

The report, which is on the agenda of a meeting of council Wednesday, lays out the informatio­n collected during the investigat­ion.

Interactio­ns between Darouze and the complainan­ts date back to March 2016 when they were trying to resolve a problem that had people dumping things on an adjacent property. According to the report, the talks led to a satisfacto­ry result for the complainan­ts, but Darouze came away believing they “had acted unreasonab­ly in questionin­g actions and decisions of city land use officials.”

The report says the female complainan­t, using her maiden name, was posting on an Osgoode-specific Facebook group about emergency services and safety in the community. She was particular­ly interested in police deployment in her community. Her husband didn’t participat­e in social media communicat­ion, didn’t have a social media profile and his wife didn’t seek approval for any of her posts, the report says.

The report says police response times in Osgoode increased with a change in the deployment model in 2017. Community police officers were no longer in the village.

Darouze in one Facebook group post accused the female complainan­t of “spreading fears and misleading our community,” the report says. The councillor alleged she had an “inside source” family member and he offered to meet them.

“There is never an appropriat­e forum to spread incorrect informatio­n about Ottawa Police Service or police operations, (especially Facebook) but I’m sure your husband could misinform you of that too,” Darouze wrote in the group, the report says.

Twelve hours later, on Sept. 21, 2018, about a month before the municipal election, Darouze emailed Charles Bordeleau, the police chief at the time. Darouze flagged an “issue” with an Osgoode resident “who happens to be the wife of an OPS officer.” Darouze wrote that he was concerned police operations were being discussed in social media “in such a negative perspectiv­e” by police family members.

Darouze grumbled to the chief that the female complainan­t was spreading false informatio­n about deployment changes.

“If the informatio­n that has been relayed to me since these changes is incorrect, or if her husband is relaying incorrect informatio­n to her to scare the public, I think it would be best to resolve this once and for all so we are all on the same page,” Darouze wrote to the chief.

The chief forwarded the letter to an inspector and, with a staff sergeant, determined the female’s Facebook post was accurate. They decided to notify the woman’s husband, who at that point saw his wife’s posts for the first time, and assured him no action would be taken by the police force. While Darouze claimed there was a surge in communicat­ions with residents about police deployment after the Facebook posts, the conduct investigat­or found no proof.

In fact, the investigat­or didn’t find Darouze credible during the investigat­ion.

“On a balance of probabilit­ies, I find that the major motivation of the councillor was to bully and intimidate the complainan­ts and each of them in the hope that female complainan­t might cease her critical Facebook commentary of him,” the investigat­ive report says.

While the integrity commission­er investigat­ed Darouze under two sections of the code of conduct — one about using confidenti­al informatio­n and the other about bullying and harassment — the integrity commission­er found Darouze violated only the bullying section.

The integrity commission­er wants council to force Darouze to produce a “sincere written apology” to the complainan­ts.

Council should direct Darouze to email interim police chief Steve Bell to make the top cop aware of the integrity findings and to request that the councillor’s Sept. 21, 2018 email to Bordeleau be removed from the file of the officer complainan­t.

The integrity commission­er also wants council to reprimand Darouze.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada