Ottawa Citizen

FORGIVE PUBLIC FOR ITS CFL SKEPTICISM

There’s a lot of informatio­n to consider when looking at CFL’s request for handout

- SCOTT STINSON

Pity the diehard Canadian Football League fan who tuned into Justin Trudeau’s news conference on Wednesday morning.

With the CFL having let it slip late Tuesday that it was asking the federal government for somewhere between $30 million and $150 million to help it stay afloat as its 2020 season is seriously imperilled by the coronaviru­s pandemic, this was the first chance to hear what the Prime Minister thought about that. Would he indicate that a life preserver was at hand?

Well, no. Trudeau responded to a question about the CFL’s request with as little detail as it was possible to offer while still acknowledg­ing the question.

The government is talking to a lot of businesses about possible supports, he said. The CFL is one of them, he acknowledg­ed. “Those discussion­s are ongoing,” he said. The verbal equivalent of the blank face emoji.

This is, to be fair to Trudeau, not out of the ordinary. Politician­s give non-answers to specific questions all the time, although Trudeau has really raised his game on that front in his daily sessions outside Rideau Cottage. But for the CFL and its fans, it is akin to hanging from a cliff, asking someone to hold out an arm, and being told they will take the matter under considerat­ion.

The edge-of-a-cliff metaphor is particular­ly apt. As has been clear for weeks, the prospects for a CFL season amid a pandemic are exceedingl­y grim. Even as some provinces begin to ease stay-at-home restrictio­ns, their various proposals for a return to normalcy put large public gatherings at the end of the line, for the obvious reason that one infected person in a packed stadium could undo months of effort to bring the virus under control. And while other profession­al leagues are considerin­g empty stadiums should they resume operations, that idea isn’t feasible for a CFL that brings in about half its revenues from ticket sales and game-day concession­s. Without paying customers in stadiums, the CFL simply doesn’t have a viable business model. And so, the pleas to Ottawa.

But even if the CFL is in desperate need of emergency support, the role of government in any rescue plan will be a tricky one to sort out. It’s a unique business in that almost all of its revenue is derived from spring to fall, when games are played. And while all kinds of companies have been dramatical­ly impacted by a global economic pause, the vast majority were earning revenue until restrictio­ns hit last month.

CFL teams have been in their revenue-producing lean times for months, and the normal spring spike has been pushed back indefinite­ly. They can make an argument for emergency assistance just like those being made by hotels and airlines and any number of industries, including the media.

The problem is that the CFL is a modest league with several non-modest participan­ts. The federal government might like the idea of propping up community-owned teams in Edmonton, Regina, and Winnipeg, especially to preserve the many hourly wage jobs that those franchises provide on game days, but there are six other teams for whom the idea of a handout becomes more complicate­d. Three teams — B.C., Hamilton and Montreal — are owned by entreprene­urs who are independen­tly wealthy. The remaining three, in Ottawa, Calgary and Toronto, are owned by businesses that control multiple profession­al sports teams, and those businesses are owned by various real-estate developers, oil executives and telecom conglomera­tes.

So while a cancelled 2020

CFL season might dramatical­ly impact the specific business of, for example, the Toronto Argonauts, what it would mean in the grand picture of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainm­ent, and beyond that to its majority owners Bell and Rogers, is much less clear.

When the CFL says it would “open its books” to the government to explain the potential losses caused by a lost season, it almost certainly doesn’t mean it would open all those other books, too.

All of this would be slightly more palatable if the CFL, like other pro sports leagues, didn’t already have the habit of seeking public money to subsidize its business. Tax dollars are poured into stadium constructi­on and refurbishm­ent, even if the business case mostly amounts to “people like sports.”

When there is pushback, the argument quickly becomes about how the public money is needed because the team will fold or leave town or won’t come in the first place. The list of government­s that have been suckered by this ploy is now so long it’s a complete surprise when a sports team doesn’t seek taxpayer money for a capital expense.

The pandemic is, obviously, something else entirely. The CFL’s teams, especially those that are community owned, are facing a crisis that is unlikely to be solved by a rapidly improving public-health picture. But the public can be forgiven for being suspicious of profession­al sports leagues that come seeking handouts. Even if this time they really mean it. sstinson@postmedia.com Twitter.com/Scott_Stinson

 ?? CANADIAN PRESS/FILES
ANDREW LAHODYNSKY­J/THE ?? The Toronto Argonauts are owned by MLSE and would be less affected by the CFL’s financial crisis than community-owned teams.
CANADIAN PRESS/FILES ANDREW LAHODYNSKY­J/THE The Toronto Argonauts are owned by MLSE and would be less affected by the CFL’s financial crisis than community-owned teams.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada