Ottawa Citizen

LEAD BY EXAMPLE

Tim Harford writes in praise of the pencil and other low-key feats of engineerin­g.

- The Financial Times Ltd. (2017). All Rights Reserved. FT and Financial Times are trademarks of the Financial Times Ltd. Not to be redistribu­ted, copied or modified in any way.

Tom Kelley is a sensitive soul. Shortly after sending the manuscript of his first book, The Art of Innovation, to his publisher, he visited Kepler's, his local bookshop in Menlo Park in Silicon Valley.

“I literally started to cry,” he confessed to a group of authors to which I belong, “thinking about all the effort and all the sacrifices authors had made to get those thousands of books on to the stage.”

But books are not the only products that should make us pause in awe and gratitude.

What about the humble pencil? In a famous 1958 essay, I, Pencil: My Family Tree as Told to Leonard E Read, Read's pencil-narrator acknowledg­es that it is easily overlooked.

“Pick me up and look me over. What do you see? Not much meets the eye — there's some wood, lacquer, the printed labelling, graphite lead, a bit of metal, and an eraser.”

Read's pencil is a proselytiz­ing free-market fan and explains that it has an impressive pedigree: its graphite is from Ceylon, mixed with Mississipp­i clay, sulphuric acid and animal fats. Its cedar wood grew naturally, but harvesting the timber required saws, axes, motors, rope and a railway car.

The pencil — if you let it — will talk your ears off on the subject of its six coats of lacquer, or the origin of the brass in its ferrule, or the eraser on its tip. (Shockingly, the pencil even reveals how the graphite gets into the middle of the wood. No spoilers.)

A modern variation on the pencil's family tree comes courtesy of Thomas Thwaites, an artist and designer whose “Toaster Project” was an attempt to design and build an ordinary toaster, beginning with assembling his own raw materials — quarrying mica, refining plastic, smelting steel.

“You could easily spend your life making a toaster,” he told me when I interviewe­d him about the project more than a decade ago.

And, indeed, he took various shortcuts. Neverthele­ss, his finished toaster cost about $1,800 and required several months of work. It looked like a cake iced by a three-year-old, and when plugged into the mains it immediatel­y caught fire.

A budget shop-bought toaster does not catch fire and costs less than a hardback book. It is unlikely to move anyone to tears, yet the people who mine metals, refine plastics, generate our electricit­y and design safe electrical appliances no doubt work at least as hard as any author.

The results are so cheap and reliable we overlook them.

Indeed, we are surrounded by products we barely understand, produced by people we never meet, often at a quality so high and a price so low — relative to our wages — that our ancestors would be staggered.

“No one sitting in a central office gave orders,” explained Milton Friedman, the free-market evangelist and Nobel Memorial Prize-winning economist who helped make Read's pencil essay famous.

The laissez-faire implicatio­ns of all this decentrali­zed complexity were obvious to Friedman, and the pencil itself put it best: “Leave all creative energies uninhibite­d ... Have faith that free men and women will respond to the Invisible Hand.”

I have sympathy with that conclusion but it does not follow as a matter of logic.

The pencil's family tree includes government-granted patents, government-owned railways and a large industrial conglomera­te. Orders from central offices are definitely given.

And a left-winger might instead be prompted by the pencil's story to lament our alienation from the objects that surround us.

We read books, make toast, sketch with pencils and yet we have no real idea how, where or by whom even these simple objects were made.

Leaving to one side the debate over economic ideology, I applaud Kelley's appreciati­on of the effort and creativity, often from people unknown, that went into the products that surrounded him.

AJ Jacobs, in his book Thanks a Thousand, gracefully underscore­d this point.

He decided to thank, in person or on the phone, everyone involved in making his morning coffee, from the barista to the pest-control expert at the warehouse, the lid designer to the workers at the reservoir that supplied the water — about a thousand people in all.

At a time when the pandemic has caused some very visible wounds to workers we see every day, it has been astonishin­g how many people have been able to keep working productive­ly. Books are still being published; pencils are still being made; I bought a new toaster just a few weeks ago.

Tears or no tears, I am trying to notice the contributi­on both of those who are no longer able to work and of those who are.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? The humble pencil, while ubiquitous and largely ignored, is anything but simple when considered alongside the effort and the people it takes to produce it — not to mention its history of achievemen­t.
GETTY IMAGES The humble pencil, while ubiquitous and largely ignored, is anything but simple when considered alongside the effort and the people it takes to produce it — not to mention its history of achievemen­t.
 ?? PATRICIA DE MELO/GETTY IMAGES ?? It takes an internatio­nal village to produce a pencil. Everyday objects are deceptive in their ability to conceal the vast resources required to make them.
PATRICIA DE MELO/GETTY IMAGES It takes an internatio­nal village to produce a pencil. Everyday objects are deceptive in their ability to conceal the vast resources required to make them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada