Ottawa Citizen

Urban boundary move by city not reconcilia­tion, Algonquin leaders say

- JON WILLING

Ottawa city council is learning that allowing property owned by the Algonquins of Ontario into the urban boundary isn't a simple planning issue, nor is opening the rural lands to developmen­t universall­y considered an attempt at Indigenous reconcilia­tion.

“This is not reconcilia­tion,” Claudette Commanda, an Algonquin Anishinabe elder from Kitigan Zibi Anishinabe­g First Nation, said in an interview Thursday.

“Reconcilia­tion is to happen with nations. Reconcilia­tion does not happen with organizati­ons.”

Algonquin First Nations that aren't part the Algonquins of Ontario (AOO) organizati­on don't believe that allowing the land inside the urban boundary is an act of reconcilia­tion, contrary to what Mayor Jim Watson and other councillor­s have suggested. AOO represents 10 communitie­s, including the federally recognized Pikwakanag­an First Nation, in land-claim negotiatio­ns with the government.

Outside the land claim process, AOO is partnering with local developmen­t company Taggart Investment­s on a proposal to build a new residentia­l community called Tewin based on Algonquin values. The community west of Carlsbad Springs would have up to 45,000 residents, but the land first must be brought inside the city's urban boundary.

An analysis by city planners gave the remote Tewin site a low rating in considerin­g new lands for the urban boundary. Staff didn't include the site on their list of proposed expansion lands, but opened the door to studying the site over five years.

Two motions approved by a joint planning and agricultur­e and rural affairs committee last week will require ratificati­on by council next Wednesday.

One motion, from Coun. Eli El-Chantiry, would stop staff-approved lands in the South March area of Kanata from being included in the urban boundary. A second motion, from Coun. Tim Tierney, takes the South March lands, combines them with land that was left to be included in the urban boundary, and assigns it to the Tewin project.

Together, the motions would open 445 hectares of developmen­t land to Tewin, despite the low grade from city staff.

Commanda acknowledg­ed that Watson had tried to build positive relationsh­ips with Indigenous people and recognized the land as unceded territory of the Algonquin people, but she said it meant little if Algonquin people weren't consulted on land matters in the name of reconcilia­tion.

“That's a slap in the face. That's an insult,” Commanda said.

It was just last month that Commanda offered the opening prayer, as she has done before at city hall events, ahead of the first council meeting of 2021 and Watson's annual state of the city address.

Commanda suggested council's approval of Tewin as part of the urban boundary expansion in the name of reconcilia­tion could damage that relationsh­ip.

“Don't talk to me about reconcilia­tion. Don't talk to me that you acknowledg­e that you are on the land of the Algonquin people, but you turn around and you simply ignore us,” Commanda said.

Commanda said she was surprised Watson didn't reach out to her for advice on the matter.

In a statement sent by his office, Watson said it was not city council's job to get involved with disagreeme­nts among Algonquin groups.

“The Tewin lands were purchased and belong to the Algonquins

of Ontario. To them, this is a meaningful Reconcilia­tion opportunit­y, and they now look to the City of Ottawa to unlock the economic developmen­t benefits that will stem from these lands. Without City Council's support, they cannot unlock and share in the prosperity that can be generated from the developmen­t of the Tewin lands,” Watson said.

“The Algonquins of Ontario are the legitimate organizati­on recognized by the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada in land-claim negotiatio­ns and settlement­s on Algonquin land in Ontario. As we saw earlier today, Algonquin leaders like Chief Wendy Jocko of Pikwakanag­an support the Tewin proposal. It is not the role of Ottawa's City Council to adjudicate internal disputes between Algonquin communitie­s.”

Still, there's pressure on Watson and councillor­s to open discussion­s with the entire Algonquin community about the future of the AOO project.

Kitigan Zibi Anishinabe­g Chief Dylan Whiteduck wrote an open letter to city council on Thursday titled, “Wrongdoing­s by the City of Ottawa & AOO developmen­t on Algonquin-Anishinaab­e Unceded Lands/Territory.”

“Reconcilia­tion must have the proper ingredient­s in place before it is spoken as such,” Whiteduck said in the letter.

City council members aren't educated about the Algonquin claim to territory in the area “or they choose not to hear,” according to Verna Polson, grand chief of the Algonquin Anishinabe­g Nation Tribal Council.

Algonquin communitie­s that aren't part of AOO criticize the organizati­on for not being representa­tive of the Algonquin people, with Pikwakanag­an being an exception.

“We as true Algonquin Anishinabe­g, we have problems getting at those tables,” Polson said. “We don't even get invites, so we don't get consultati­on or were never part of a consultati­on process when it comes to land issues that affects our members and our rights in our traditiona­l territory. It's very upsetting.”

Added Polson: “We're going to start pushing back.”

 ??  ?? Verna Polson
Verna Polson

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada