Ottawa Citizen

Many locals disagree with intensific­ation plans

- RANDALL DENLEY Randall Denley is an Ottawa political commentato­r and author. Contact him at randallden­ley1@gmail.com

Ottawa city councillor­s and their planning staff believe that the very future of our city depends on peppering your neighbourh­ood with three- and four-storey apartment buildings. A good-sized chunk of Westboro will be the first to experience this brilliant future, but the city's new Official Plan anticipate­s greater density in every establishe­d neighbourh­ood.

For Westboro, that means four-storey buildings on Churchill Avenue with no limit on the number of units. Byron Avenue, not exactly a major road, will get the same treatment, but with a three-storey limit. Single-family homes on corner lots can be replaced with six-unit buildings and even small streets could have three-storey developmen­t.

Over time, the city's plan could dramatical­ly alter the nature of Ottawa's establishe­d neighbourh­oods, changing forever the urban fabric that makes our city livable and distinct. That seems like quite a big deal, but if you don't like it, too bad. The idea is so self-evidently good that this radical alteration of our city is sailing through city council.

Neither community groups nor most in the developmen­t industry are enthusiast­ic about the city's new apartment mania, but that doesn't matter.

City planning decisions can no longer be appealed and the city is in the process of changing residentia­l zoning so that higher densities are allowed as a right.

You might wonder how this vast city has become so short of future developmen­t land that it needs to cram up to 60 per cent of new growth into establishe­d neighbourh­oods. Most councillor­s will be quick to tell you that massive intensific­ation is essential. Why, without it, councillor­s would have to approve developmen­t on farmland or new suburbs beyond the reach of transit. City councillor­s are vehemently opposed to that, except on days when they think it's fine.

One of those days came last week, when councillor­s decided to reject their own policies and their planners' recommenda­tions by adding farmland to Riverside South and approving a new satellite city on the Tewin lands near Carlsbad Springs. In a single day, councillor­s undermined the core argument in favour of forced urban intensific­ation.

City councillor­s' illogic won't slow the intensific­ation push, but their wishful thinking might. The Westboro plan, for example, imagines that there is a market for multi-unit apartment buildings without parking. People in the developmen­t industry are not so convinced, arguing that those who can afford an apartment in Westboro also want to own a car.

The difficulty in making a profit is a problem that will deter the big builders. Far from opening up desirable neighbourh­oods to the masses, Westboro intensific­ation will produce costly, niche housing.

It's expensive to buy a house, tear it down, then plan a unique replacemen­t building.

The economies of scale that make suburban housing somewhat affordable won't happen in Westboro. It's a market for small, specialty builders at best.

With little discernibl­e intensific­ation enthusiasm from residents of establishe­d neighbourh­oods, one might have hoped that councillor­s would step back and say, “Hey, people don't want this. Why are we doing it?”

It's an excellent question. The real answer is that it's essential for councillor­s to pretend that intensific­ation can meet future housing needs, even if there is little reason to believe that's so. The alternativ­e would be approving more suburban developmen­t of the type most councillor­s have spent years deriding. You know, cars, roads, so-called sprawl, all of that. Councillor­s are totally against that, except when there is an exception.

One thing they might want to consider, as they go about ignoring public opinion and riling up people right across the city, is that there is an election next year.

Councillor­s are well on their way to creating that rarest of things, a city election issue people care about, and they are putting themselves on the wrong side of it.

The public can't stop councillor­s from making arbitrary and damaging planning decisions, but they can fire them. If things keep going like this, councillor­s are going to have to declare a political emergency.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada