Surely, we can do better

Dear Editor:

What is going on at City Hall? First waterfront parkland at Skaha was recommended by staff to be changed to multi-residential zoning. Now our Class 1 (the best) farmland at Munson Mountain is recommended for a BMX track leased out annually for $1.

How can these proposals be considered let alone be recommended?

Why would the City consider such an urban intrusion at the gateway of our world-class wine bench?

Diversification of our economic base is commendable, but why rob Peter to pay Paul? According to Penticton’s own economic development data, the No. 1 surveyed “appeal” in Penticton are our wineries. From a farming perspective the land at the base of Munson Mountain has remarkable attributes, as particularly noted in the B.C. Grape Atlas of the Okanagan: eastern exposure, frost free elevation, excellent drainage, Class 1 soil. And it’s cleared and ready to be planted.

Why would the City not want to encourage farming and support this strong economic driver? Instead of leasing this land for a $1, why not sell this land at the substantial profit it will bring and use the funds to buy parkland near where people live and play?

So back to the question of what is going on at city hall. Why are these proposals that create continued community conflict presented in the first place?

Surely, we can do better! Common sense and good stewardship needs to prevail. Parkland and farmland should never be sacrificed as an easy fix for urban problems. Reject this proposal. I appeal to council to have the wisdom and vision to find a location that works for the whole community. We can do better. Jana McFarlane Penticton