Penticton Herald

Technique does matter when taking a blood pressure reading

- KEITH ROACH Readers may email questions to ToYourGood­Health@med.cornell.edu or send mail to 628 Virginia Dr., Orlando, Fla., U.S.A., 32803.

DEAR DR. ROACH: During my annual wellness visits to the doctor, my blood pressure is always taken. But it is done differentl­y depending on the person taking it. How many times should the pump be used, and does it make a difference in the reading?

My readings are coming out hugely different. This last reading was 120/82. Last year it was 160/94, and the previous year 180/110. It was never high until the two high readings.

This year the person taking it only pumped it about four times. In previous readings, the nurse pumped it until I felt like my arm was going to be cut in half.

There is definitely a difference in the procedure being used, which I believe would affect anyone. Any thoughts?

ANSWER: The technique used to obtain blood pressure must be correct, or the blood pressure reading can be erroneousl­y high or low.

Many readers have written in over the years noting mistakes commonly made in checking the blood pressure in the office.

The cuff should be inflated to about 30 points higher than the expected blood pressure, which can be estimated by feeling the pulse when inflating the cuff.

The size of the inflation bulb, the size of the cuff and the size of the arm all determine how many times the bulb needs to be compressed to get to the correct inflation pressure.

If the examiner doesn’t inflate the cuff high enough, the measured blood pressure will be much lower than the actual blood pressure.

If the cuff is inflated too high, it can cause enough discomfort and anxiety in a patient that the blood pressure can temporaril­y go way up. I wonder if this happened in you.

In absence of anxiety or pain, the cuff can be pumped up to 300 mmHg and it will not affect the measured blood pressure, but it’s unnecessar­y to pump it so high.

The other commonly made errors in checking a blood pressure include: using the wrong cuff size for a person’s arm; errors in patient position — the patient should be seated with support for the back, with legs uncrossed and resting on the floor; and errors in deflating the cuff too quickly (2-3 mmHg per second is best, and much slower than many people do).

There are other considerat­ions as well. The room should not be too cold, the patient should not be talking, caffeine and smoking should be avoided in the hour or so before the test, a person should sit quietly for at least five minutes before the test, and the cuff should be on bare skin, not over a shirt or, worse yet, a thick sweater.

Checking blood pressure several times (I was taught always to use the average of three readings) reduces random error.

I don’t discuss topics that may lead to anxiety prior to checking blood pressure. This especially includes a person’s weight.

Since a high blood pressure diagnosis often means lifelong medication, taking a few extra minutes to be sure of correct technique is critical.

Alternativ­ely, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring with a device has been shown to be a better predictor than office-based measuremen­ts.

Finally, an accurate, certified home device makes it easier to get many readings, which can lead to better decisions.

DEAR DR. ROACH: I was just diagnosed with nocardiosi­s.

Not knowing anything about it, I started to do some research and, like in most cases, going to the internet really didn’t help.

My pulmonary doctor didn’t tell me much except to put me on sulfametho­xazole drugs. I reacted poorly and was switched to minocyclin­e. Are there any diet changes I should be aware of, or life changes? Should I get rid of the 28 houseplant­s I have in my apartment?

I was surprised to find a group page on social media. It is more widespread than I was aware of, but there seems to be very little informatio­n on the harmful effects and guidelines to follow.

I would appreciate any informatio­n regarding this disease and what to expect and signs of getting better or worse.

ANSWER: Nocardia is a genus of bacteria that is an unusual cause of infection. Lung and skin are the most common sites of infection, but it may also affect the brain or become widely spread throughout the body.

Most people with nocardia infection have weakened immune systems, such as by HIV, diabetes, cancer or drugs that suppress the immune system.

About a third of cases occur in people with no identifiab­le immune system disease. Far more men than women are affected by nocardia.

Symptoms of lung infection are nonspecifi­c and may include cough, fever, weight loss, shortness of breath and night sweats. Lung infections are most acquired by inhaling dust containing the organism.

Nocardia is found in the soil, and houseplant­s are known sources of the infectious soil. It’s possible one of your plants contained the bacteria. Still, I think that getting rid of all your plants is unnecessar­y. I would recommend an N95 mask if you are repotting or gardening outside.

Treatment of nocardia of the lung in people with normal immune systems usually involves trimethopr­im and sulfametho­xazole; since that seemed not to do well for you, minocyclin­e is a reasonable option.

Your immune system is going to be doing much of the work, aided by the antibiotic­s, so you can help your immune system by sleeping well, avoiding excess alcohol and eating a generally healthy diet.

Recurrence or failure of your symptoms to get better would be a reason to consider changing therapy. An infectious disease doctor may be an additional resource along with your pulmonary specialist.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada