Penticton Herald

Old subdivisio­n creating new problems for Kaleden

- BY JOE FRIES

More than a century after a three-lot subdivisio­n was approved on a property in Kaleden, the current owners’ plans to redevelop the site have run into a wave of opposition.

The owners of 130 Ponderosa Ave., which is actually three separate titles under one address and only about 50 metres from Skaha Lake, are looking to replace a single-family home and garage with a new home on each of the three lots.

The new homes were proposed to be long and narrow to fit the lots, which are only about eight metres in width, with contempora­ry styling and rooftop patios.

However, the lots aren’t wide enough to meet current zoning requiremen­ts of a 7.5metre side-yard setback and a minimum fivemetre building width. With that in mind, the property owners applied to the Regional District of Okanagan-Similkamee­n for a developmen­t variance permit to reduce the side-yard setbacks to 1.5 m to make space for five-metre-wide homes.

That proposal was accepted by RDOS staff, which recommende­d to the board Thursday that the permit be approved.

“Nobody likes this. It would be too much building on too little land, but the problem is this was a subdivisio­n that was approved in 1910 and they are three legal lots,” explained Bill Newell, RDOS chief administra­tive officer.

He also warned that the RDOS could be ordered to pay damages if the property owners took the matter to court and convinced a judge the RDOS rendered their land worthless.

“Typically, a municipali­ty would purchase those properties if they didn’t want to see them developed, whereas in our case we don’t have a service or funding for that,” added Newell.

But when it came time to vote on the permit, the board rejected staff’s recommenda­tion and denied the applicatio­n on the urging of Subrina Monteith, director for Area I (Skaha West/Kaleden/Apex).

“Lots were created in 1910. They were very small lots, very small homes. That’s when Kaleden was intended to be a city. That’s when Kaleden was going to become something,” said Monteith.

But today, “We are a rural community,” she continued.

“There is no other developmen­t in Kaleden with this density, so the community does not support it.”

Monteith noted other concerns centred on traffic, parking and potential impacts on the lake, and that residents have called for broader look at the issues that have emerged with regard to old subdivisio­ns.

“It’s unfortunat­e that this wasn’t caught sooner. Other properties in Kaleden are in the exact same position of having these narrow lots and the community does want to see this reviewed,” said Monteith.

Jeff Gagnon, who works for Okanagan Developmen­t Consultant­s and spoke on behalf of the owners, said they wanted to keep one of the homes for themselves and give the other two to their children.

Gagnon said the plan as proposed had a total building footprint of 270 square metres, while the current zoning bylaw allows for a single building on the site of up to 335 square metres.

 ?? ?? Subrina Monteith
Subrina Monteith

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada