Prairie Post (East Edition)

Crop rotation and insect pressures

- By James Tansey, PhD. Provincial Insect/ Pest Management Specialist, Regina

As in most years, we have seen heavy insect pressure in some crops this year. These range from the perennial issue of flea beetles in canola, localized wheat midge pressures and high grasshoppe­r numbers in several crops. Can localized insect pressures be influenced by crop rotation? That is, can last year’s crop affect the numbers of insect pests in subsequent years? The short answer is, it depends.

Many insect pests we deal with in Saskatchew­an are specialist­s. That is, through co-evolution with specific plant families and biochemica­l defenses that evolve to prevent insect feeding, their food choices are limited to closelyrel­ated plants that share a similar defense strategy. An example of this is the crucifer flea beetles, Phyllotret­a cruciferae. This insect shared a co-evolutiona­ry history with members of the Brassicace­ae plant family, like canola. Defense compounds such as the breakdown of products in glucosinol­ates actually act as attractant­s to these beetles. They have evolved to get around potent defenses to take advantage of these hosts. Physical and biochemica­l properties of potential host plants influence the choices specific insects make.

A “host” is a term to describe the suitabilit­y of a plant as food or a resource for the developmen­t of young insects.

A “true host” allows the developmen­t of juvenile insects; a “food host” can be used by adult insects for nourishmen­t, but will not support developmen­t. An example of this is the relationsh­ip of cabbage seedpod weevil (CSW) and members of the Brassicace­ae. Adult weevils will feed on a number of species within this plant family, but egg laying typically occurs and larvae can complete developmen­t on only a few member species. True hosts for CSW include canola and brown mustard; food hosts include brassicace­ous weeds like flixweed. This means that contributi­ons to the population associated with larval developmen­t can contribute to next year’s problems in another food host planted in the same area.

Although this seems like a good general approach to predicting problems, it can be confounded by two major factors: generalist feeding and insect movement, including to and from overwinter­ing sites.

Generalist feeding is not limited to one or two species, but can feed and develop on multiple plants within a family or even among members of multiple plant families. Examples of insects that employ this feeding strategy include the Lygus species and several of the grasshoppe­r species that can be problemati­c in crops in Saskatchew­an. Although generalist­s demonstrat­e preference­s among plant species, they are capable of exploiting a broad group of potential hosts. Prediction­s based on last year’s pressures can be problemati­c in these cases.

Many insects overwinter as adults and move into crops once activity begins in the spring. Some are also excellent flyers and can cover great distances to feed or lay eggs. This reduces the predictabi­lity of pressures based on last year’s incidence. However, given a choice, many insects will limit their movement as much as possible, making preferred hosts near sites of adult emergence or deposition of eggs (in the case of those insects that overwinter as eggs or larvae), more susceptibl­e.

Some local insect pressures are also strongly influenced by climate. For example, wheat midge overwinter­s in the ground as larvae and pupae. Survival and emergence of adults in the summer is poor if spring conditions are dry. Heavy local population­s, followed by moist conditions the following spring, coupled with the presence of a suitable host like wheat can lead to problems. Grasshoppe­rs are another example of population­s influenced significan­tly by weather. In the case of most pest grasshoppe­r species, moist conditions contribute to outbreaks of fungal and bacterial diseases and are detrimenta­l to population growth.

Crop rotation can affect insect pressure year to year but many caveats need to be considered. These include: the host range of specific pests, climatic effects and mobility of pests. In general, rotation away from preferred hosts in subsequent years can be beneficial for controllin­g damage by many specialist­s. Work continues on increasing our understand­ing of the interactio­n of these factors and predictive power will certainly increase.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada