Regina Leader-Post

Wall government needs to take a hard look at itself

- MURRAY MANDRYK Murray Mandryk is the political columnist for the Regina Leader-Post. mmandryk@postmedia.com

There are a few sure symptoms of a government that has gotten far too insular. Sadly, it seems Premier Brad Wall’s Saskatchew­an Party government is displaying far too many of those symptoms right now.

The more positive prognosis for the Wall government’s condition is that it hasn’t progressed to the point where it’s ignoring all public complaints. This should offer a little hope to Sask. Party supporters that whatever ails this government isn’t yet fatal.

Evidence of this can be found in the government’s decision to walk back its 2017-18 budget decision to cut $4.8 million in library funding, restore some level of grants-in-lieu for some urban communitie­s and Monday’s decision to restore more than half the cuts it made to funding of funeral costs for the indigent.

A contrite Social Services Minister Tina Beaudry-Mellor confessed her government made a mistake when it cut funding of funeral services for the poor from $3,850 to $2,100 in an effort to save $1 million. On Monday, Beaudry-Mellor said it would top up the $2,100 by paying as much as $700 more for funeral services or rituals, and would change its approach to embalming. The moves reduce the government’s projected savings to only $400,000 from the original projected $1 million in savings.

It certainly was not enough for some critics of the Sask. Party, who now have blood in their teeth and want a total restoratio­n of funding. They also seem to want a reinstatem­ent of the Saskatchew­an Transporta­tion Company (STC). That isn’t going to happen.

But if the issue is Saskatchew­an’s tired old political tribalism, the Wall government needs to take a long, hard look at itself before it attempts to place the blame on its critics.

Consider the Saskatchew­an Health Authority’s highly politicall­y charged appointmen­ts

— a classic case of a government that is far too insular.

What’s at issue isn’t just the resignatio­n of board appointee Don Rae — president and

CEO of Yorkton-based Crusader Drilling

Corp. — over sharing inappropri­ate Facebook posts mocking Mexicans and suggesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wants to teach our children about “anal sex and made-up genders.”

This is a government that can’t even vet the right partisans for board appointmen­ts, as indicated by Health Minister Jim Reiter’s explanatio­n that Rae did not undergo “significan­t vetting” because he was “already in the system.” He was previously the politicall­y appointed chair of the Sunrise Regional Health Authority board.

Really? If this Sask. Party government was selecting a candidate or was hiring for the most junior ministeria­l assistant position, the first thing it would do is check out the prospectiv­e employees’ Facebook pages for inappropri­ate postings.

Unfortunat­ely, the only vetting the Sask. Party seems truly interested in is vetting for partisans who are compliant when it comes to following Sask. Party government wishes. Perhaps this is nothing new. The old NDP government was horrific for peppering boards with partisans, and even assigning party commissars to jobs in Crown corporatio­ns to ensure the wishes of government were carried out.

Were this a less insular government, it might have demonstrat­ed some progress from the very things it used to criticize the NDP for. It could have sought out career health profession­als, administra­tors or policy analysts to form the majority of the new super health board.

But this is a government so insular that it now lashes out at any criticism in a personal and vindictive way.

The latest example is an inappropri­ately nasty letter from Finance Minister Kevin Doherty to Maclean’s over a piece largely about Wall’s decline in popularity. Rather than go after the content of the piece, Doherty’s letter was largely a personal smear campaign on the credibilit­y of its Saskatoon based-author Tammy Robert. That was followed by an aggressive Twitter campaign in which the Sask. Party’s feed called the piece an NDP narrative.

The real narrative here is one of a Sask. Party government that makes its decisions in isolation, only backpedals when public pressure makes it obvious that it is dead wrong and viciously goes after critics who might dare point that out. This government is far too insular.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada