Regina Leader-Post

Roundabout­s on the road and the internet

- JOHN GORMLEY John Gormley is a broadcaste­r, lawyer, author and former Progressiv­e Conservati­ve MP whose radio talk show is heard weekdays from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on 650 CKOM Saskatoon and 980 CJME Regina

Without much experience with roundabout­s or traffic circles, Saskatchew­an drivers will be tested with two new roundabout­s on a secondary highway near Regina.

Common for years in Europe, roundabout­s have become popular in new neighbourh­oods where small, single-lane versions manage traffic at intersecti­ons. But for highway roundabout­s who knows how well they’ll work with the same drivers who can’t seem to merge from a freeway ramp, turn from lane to lane or do a constructi­on zone zipper merge?

Many remember Saskatoon’s infamous Eighth Street traffic circle, which existed throughout the 1970s and often saw driving more akin to a demolition derby.

Many drivers would not yield to the inside or stay in the outside lane if taking the next exit. Some even bravely tried using their signal lights, to no avail.

Here’s hoping Saskatchew­an joins the rest of the world in successful­ly using roundabout­s.

Last weekend, an otherwise healthy young man died in an east Regina neighbourh­ood park. When the case was deemed “non-criminal” by police, it didn’t take long for public skepticism to form.

The 18-year-old had been in the park with friends in the middle of the night and when drunkenly walking home he apparently slipped, which caused the sawed-off shotgun in his pants to accidental­ly discharge and kill him.

Described by his father as a “good kid” (they always are) the young man apparently ignored his father’s advice to “get rid” of the gun.

Everything related to a sawed-off shotgun is illegal — creating one, owning it, carrying it, storing it and the list goes on.

The preferred weapon of criminals and gangsters, a sawed-off shotgun is most likely to kill someone being threatened by it; an innocent bystander could also be shot, or the person using it might shoot himself.

Given those choices, fate and karma intervened. And because the only person who could be charged is dead, no criminal charges can be laid.

But it would naive to think that officers from the street crimes unit, specializi­ng in guns and gangs, won’t examine the weapon, any fingerprin­ts and some family and friends.

The articles, blogs and books began several years ago on disconnect­ing from smartphone­s and the associated emails, social media feeds and apps.

Beyond the neuroscien­ce of dopamine production and compulsion loop behaviour associated with smartphone use, it’s just better to attune ourselves to other humans and actually talk, connect and empathize.

In addition to house rules in many families — no smartphone­s at the table and no sleeping with them in the same room — some people take digital sabbatical­s or detoxes.

Recently, Josh Spector, writing at medium.com, proposed an approach to breaking bad habits and taking back control of our lives by habituatin­g better smartphone behaviour and sticking to it.

His tips are simple and good: Stop checking the phone in the car, during TV commercial­s or while standing in line. This gives each of us the message that we are in charge of our own attention spans and smartphone­s need not be the default.

Keep the phone across the room when it’s not in use, disable all notificati­ons and put the phone away after posting something on social media, as not to get drawn into waiting for a reaction or encouragin­g unnecessar­y usage.

Josh suggests there’s nothing wrong with random surfing and getting lost in the net, but set a specific time limit after which the phone is put away.

One tip I thought very helpful was to set up a buffer zone at the beginning and end of the day so that checking the smartphone is not the first and last thing done each day — take a few minutes to start and end the day without the phone.

We can control the technology — by controllin­g ourselves.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada