Regina Leader-Post

Diocese sorry for outdated letter on HPV

- JONATHAN CHARLTON jcharlton@postmedia.com Twitter.com/J_Charlton

SASKATOON

The Archdioces­e of Regina apologized Thursday for an out-of-date letter regarding the HPV vaccine sent to Catholic school boards and parents this week.

“We certainly apologize for this slipping out sort of under our radar and we’re going to do everything we can to fix everything we can fix at this stage,” said Archdioces­an Theologian Brett Salkeld.

The Bishops of Saskatchew­an in the letter say the HPV vaccine must not be compulsory for young students, according to a copy published by CBC. It states a concern that the vaccine could lead to a false sense of security leading young people to engage in risky behaviour, and undermine a healthy sense of sexuality. It states scientific support is still at an early stage, and long-term effects are unknown.

But while it’s dated Sept. 25, 2017, it was actually written about 10 years ago when less was known about HPV and HPV vaccinatio­n, and was issued every year since, Salkeld said.

No one noticed it getting out of date until this year, probably because this will be the first year Saskatchew­an boys also get the vaccine, he said.

“When it broke in the media of course we heard from doctors and whoever else pointing out other areas that were out of date, so we immediatel­y decided we need to consult with medical profession­als who know what’s happened in the last 10 years on this file.”

A new letter will be coming out, he said.

“This is not one diocese, we have five bishops to sign this by the time it’s done, that’s not something you do in a week. But, we appreciate that there’s a certain urgency, so it’s going to be a high priority, but we’re not going to rush it so much that we’re going to regret it.”

However the bishops might have been right — just for the wrong reasons, said Arthur Schafer, founding director of the Centre for Profession­al and Applied Ethics at the University of Manitoba.

“Whether a risk is worth taking depends on both the absolute risk and the relationsh­ip between the potential risk and the potential benefit. When the potential benefits are substantia­l then it is reasonable to accept some level of risk. But the net benefit of the HPV vaccine is uncertain. Even women who have persistent infections with HPV will most likely not develop cancer if they are regularly screened,” he said.

Canadians, including Catholics, overwhelmi­ngly reject the teachings of the Catholic Church when it comes to sexuality, Schafer said. And the belief that public health campaigns around condoms, birth control and the HPV vaccine will lead to an increase in promiscuit­y has no evidence to support it, he said.

However, the HPV vaccine is a controvers­ial health measure, he said. It’s effective against just two of the more than 100 strains of the virus and no long-term studies have been done to measure its effectiven­ess. A 2009 study found it caused some side-effects including fainting and blood clots.

Another study found educationa­l materials from profession­al medical associatio­ns “did not address the full complexity of the issues surroundin­g the vaccine and did not provide balanced recommenda­tions on risks and benefits.”

The vaccine may even be counter-productive if women mistakenly believe they are fully protected and forgo cervical screenings, which have brought down cervical cancer rates, Schafer said.

According to the Canadian Cancer Society, current evidence states HPV vaccines are safe and their side-effects are similar to other vaccines. It recommends girls and women between the ages of nine and 45 and boys and young men between the ages of nine and 26 be vaccinated.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada