Regina Leader-Post

PROTESTS OVER THE TRUDEAU GOVERNMENT’S CONTENTIOU­S SUMMER JOBS PROGRAM HAVE SHIFTED TO THE COURTS, WITH SEVERAL GROUPS CHALLENGIN­G IT ON THE GROUNDS OF FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND EXPRESSION.

Liberals face more religious freedom cases

- Brian Platt bplatt@postmedia.com Twitter.com/btaplatt

• A batch of new and anticipate­d court challenges against the government’s Canada Summer Jobs abortion clause shows the legal fight over the controvers­ial program is widening, and will likely last years.

The new challenges move beyond the right to advocate against abortion, and more squarely into arguments about religious freedom and compelled speech.

An evangelica­l Christian organizati­on recently filed a case in Federal Court that marks the first time a religious group has entered the fray. On Tuesday, an Ontario concrete company filed a challenge that argues the attestatio­n illegally forces businesses to take a stand on divisive moral and social issues.

Multiple sources, meanwhile, have told the National Post that more faith-based challenges are coming and the fight is expected to spread over the coming months to provincial courtrooms and human rights tribunals.

The attestatio­n was added this year and required all Canada Summer Jobs applicants to declare that both the job and the organizati­on’s “core mandate” respect reproducti­ve rights (defined as access to abortion), as well as other rights and values underlying the Charter.

Following widespread outcry, the government issued a clarificat­ion that “core mandate” refers only to activities, not beliefs — but many organizati­ons still refused to sign the attestatio­n or wrote in their own interpreta­tion. Government figures show 1,559 applicatio­ns were eventually rejected over incomplete or modified attestatio­ns, though hundreds of religious groups were also approved for grants.

The first Federal Court challenge was filed in January by the Toronto Right To Life Associatio­n, but the case has been slowed as additional allegation­s are filed by the anti-abortion group. A hearing is expected in September to deal with the allegation the government wrongly withheld documents during disclosure.

At the end of May, a registered charity called Power To Change, which does Christian student ministry on campuses, filed its own Federal Court case over its applicatio­ns for a total of 44 summer jobs being rejected because it included a letter that read in part: “Our belief is contrary to the current government’s view on women’s reproducti­ve rights. Our honestly held belief is protected under the Charter.”

Power To Change is now contesting a government request of the court to consolidat­e the case with the Right To Life case, or to stay the proceeding­s until the Right To Life case is decided.

“This Applicant is not principall­y involved in raising awareness about abortion, unlike (Right To Life),” says its reply. It argues the government would gain “a significan­t tactical advantage” by tying their religionba­sed case to the anti-abortion case, and says their own challenge represents “a far larger segment of the nonprofit sector.”

The entire problem with the attestatio­n, argues Power To Change, is that it is overly broad and “not just blocking funding to organizati­ons involved in fighting abortion, but also funding of organizati­ons that do not have this mandate.”

A separate Federal Court case was filed on Tuesday by Sarnia Concrete Products Ltd., which argues the attestatio­n tried to force it to align with “a particular position on abortion, a controvers­ial moral, ethical and social issue and perhaps the most politicall­y divisive issue in Canada.”

“As a for-profit corporatio­n, Sarnia Concrete does not have a position or opinion on abortion or other political, moral, ethical and social issues completely unrelated to its business,” the notice of applicatio­n says.

Sarnia Concrete’s CEO, Roy Botma, declined to comment. Botma has served on the boards of numerous Christian organizati­ons, including a private school called Redeemer University College, but the court challenge is focused on the right of his concrete business to stay neutral on such issues as abortion.

The court challenge was announced by a group called Free To Do Business, which held a news conference in Ottawa on Tuesday to say more businesses are preparing to file similar challenges.

SARNIA CONCRETE DOES NOT HAVE A POSITION OR OPINION ON ABORTION.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada