Regina Leader-Post

WHICH FOUR MOVE ON AT WORLD CUP?

Assessing the chances of each contender still playing for global soccer immortalit­y

- KURTIS LARSON klarson@postmedia.com twitter.com/KurtLarSun

The last eight at this World Cup features four sides that haven’t won a World Cup plus England, which hasn’t won a major tournament since 1966, the year it hosted this tournament.

Here’s what we know: At least one of Russia, Croatia, Sweden or England will play in the final at Luzhniki Stadium on July 15. That alone adds intrigue. The first question is, which of these eight sides have the best chance of reaching the semifinal stage of what has been a wildly entertaini­ng tournament?

URUGUAY VS. FRANCE

Talking point: Uruguay’s Edinson Cavani has been the most dynamic No. 9 at this tournament. But a calf injury suffered in a 2-1 win over Portugal leaves his inclusion in doubt. The PSG striker’s exclusion could tip the scales for France.

Why Uruguay could win: I don’t think they can if Cavani doesn’t play. If he does, it provides Luis Suarez far more space to operate. The South Americans are obviously good enough up front, but it’s the defensive pairing of Diego Godin and Jose Gimenez that has been as good as any centre back tandem at this World Cup. While Uruguay might not possess the big names in midfield, it has big players in important positions. I wouldn’t pick Uruguay to win this fixture. But I’d also find it difficult to bet against a side that shows up at every major tournament.

Why France could win: We’ve yet to see the best of a French side that has everything trending in its favour. Les Bleus are healthy, they have a complete roster and have been in so many big moments since 2016 it just feels like they’ll be more prepared for this occasion. The French are winning games despite their strikers — Olivier Giroud and Antoine Griezmann — hardly combining at this tournament. You get the feeling this France team hasn’t come close to peaking. When you factor in Kylian Mbappe’s form, you have to think France should get to the final four.

Advantage: France

BRAZIL VS. BELGIUM

Talking point: Brazil’s Neymar continues to be mocked for his incessant play-acting. Yet he’s also been Brazil’s top player in back-to-back games. Makes you wonder what we’ll be talking about after this one.

Why Brazil could win: It’s difficult — maybe impossible — to spot a weakness in a Brazilian team that probably has the most dynamic front four attackers in the tournament. Aside from Neymar, Willian has been one of the best wide players in Russia, while Philippe Coutinho is the best remaining attacking midfielder at this World Cup. We’ve yet to see the best from Gabriel Jesus in what was supposed to be his breakout tournament.

But what I like most about this Brazilian team is its ability to defend.

Why Belgium could win: Brazil has yet to meet a side at this tournament with the number of difference-makers Belgium brings into this match. Romelu Lukaku presents something different and Belgium’s two wide players — Eden Hazard and Dries Mertens — offer more than Mexico’s Hirving Lozano and Carlos Vela. The question for head coach Roberto Martinez is whether he’ll move to a more defensive posture. If he does, the Belgians have enough to stymie Brazil’s attack and hit back on the counter.

Advantage: Brazil

RUSSIA VS. CROATIA

Talking point: The hosts have captured the hearts of a nation. Nobody thought they’d make it this far. Is it possible they’ll make the last four? Why Russia could win: After watching Russia take down a naive and arrogant Spanish team, who’s to say Russia can’t beat anyone on this side of the bracket? Goalkeeper Igor Akinfeev is playing well enough to keep the hosts in games. And man-mountain striker Artem Dzyuba seems to be on the end of everything played into the box. The key for Russian coach Stanislav Cherchesov will be convincing his side it needs to play the same way it did against Spain. They’re just not good enough to go toe-to-toe with Croatia.

Why Croatia could win: The Croatians are just as balanced as Brazil or England — and might have the best box-to-box midfield tandem in Luka Modric and Ivan Rakitic. While I’d argue this Croatia team isn’t on Brazil or England’s level right now, the structure coach Zlatko Dalic has implemente­d should see them reach a semifinal.

Advantage: Croatia

SWEDEN VS. ENGLAND

Talking point: Is soccer “coming home?”

Why Sweden could win: This Swedish team takes pride in its defending. They drop behind the ball better than anyone at this tournament and don’t take chances in their own third. Their mindset, “our structure, our collective mentality, our belief,” can see them through any occasion. There’s no reason not to believe that after watching them outlast the Netherland­s, Italy, Germany and Mexico just to reach this point. The Swedes have a decent record against England. They’re going to fancy themselves to stymie an England side that might not have the ingenuity to break them down.

Why England could win: You get the feeling this is an England team that’s not going to be as naive as Sweden’s previous opponents. Coach Gareth Southgate isn’t about to let that happen. Having watched England’s momentous win over Colombia Tuesday night in Moscow, it just seems like the Three Lions are completely engaged and peaking at the right time. This is the most well-prepared England team I’ve seen. And the Three Lions are battle-tested after an extremely hard-fought Round of 16 fixture. Soccer might not be “coming home,” but it’s going one more game after this.

Advantage: England

 ?? FRANCISCO SECO/AP ?? Whether Uruguay’s Edinson Cavani, seen here celebratin­g a goal, will play against France is a big factor on the outcome. The striker is recovering from a calf injury, and the South American side is an infinitely more dangerous opponent with him in the...
FRANCISCO SECO/AP Whether Uruguay’s Edinson Cavani, seen here celebratin­g a goal, will play against France is a big factor on the outcome. The striker is recovering from a calf injury, and the South American side is an infinitely more dangerous opponent with him in the...
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada