Regina Leader-Post

Tone-deaf caucus retreat shows why Liberals are rejected here

- MURRAY MANDRYK Mandryk is the political columnist for the Regina Leader-post mmandryk@postmedia.com

Federal Environmen­t Minister Catherine Mckenna is right that the Saskatchew­an Party government lacks an effective climatecha­nge strategy.

While it’s one thing to say that in Ottawa, it is quite different to come to the heart of the Prairies to dismiss and even boldly condemn any concerns about a carbon tax the duly elected government might have. For that reason, this week’s federal Liberal caucus meeting in Saskatoon accomplish­ed nothing more than a rather large carbon footprint.

Mckenna and the Liberals were not just tone-deaf.

They were downright obtuse to frustratio­ns in the wake of the federal court ruling on the Trans Mountain pipeline, Premier Scott Moe’s well-known disdain for the carbon tax and former Saskatchew­an premier and sometimes-self-appointed western voice Brad Wall’s assertions that he hasn’t witnessed this level of western alienation in Alberta and Saskatchew­an in his adult life.

The federal Liberals’ Saskatchew­an retreat should have provided some conciliato­ry sense of empathy to real-world problems out here. Instead, they offered quite the opposite.

“We’ve been clear that the provinces (are) the best place to design a system that makes sense for them,” Mckenna told reporters, suggesting that Saskatchew­an’s refusal to resubmit an acceptable climate-change plan by the Sept. 1 deadline is a refusal to recognize that pollution has costs. “But we’ve been also clear — and the prime minister’s been extremely clear — that if provinces don’t take serious climate action, if they don’t recognize the cost of pollution, that we will have to step in and we will return the revenues to the individual­s directly.”

Intransige­ntly dictating that Ottawa “will have to step in and we will return the revenues to the individual­s directly” was likely a big reason why Moe described his 45-minute meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday as “frosty.”

“The federal government should recognize the Prairie Resilience plan that we have put forward, that has real results not only in emissions reductions here in the province but in the ability to enhance sequestrat­ion and have a real impact on climate change.”

Sure, Mckenna is right about how obstrepero­us the Sask.

Party government has been. By the time Moe took over from Wall, it was clear the Sask. Party was never going to accept the federal Liberals’ carbon-pricing formula that concludes with a $50-a-tonne levy by 2022.

But with the arrival of Doug Ford’s brand of Progressiv­e Conservati­ves in Ontario this summer, Saskatchew­an is no longer a lone voice in the western wilderness. The chorus is likely soon to be joined by Alberta United Conservati­ve Party Opposition Leader Jason Kenney. If not, that province’s NDP Premier Rachel Notley is putting carbon-tax implementa­tion on hiatus over the Trans Mountain pipeline.

The Liberals need to tune in. An NDP premier is aligning with Conservati­ves against a federal environmen­tal policy. Wall — a passionate guy, but not exactly known for fits of hysterical hyperbole — is describing all this in terms of heightened western sovereignt­y sentiments.

Yes, there’s always politics in play. There have even been rumblings about the formulatio­n of a far bigger western (specifical­ly, anti-federal Liberal) political lobby backed by oil money. Wall’s name has been tossed out as a possible front for this. But one might think that would have alerted Liberals to the reality that they needed to provide something other than scolding for not supporting their unpopular tax. An offer to explore how Saskatchew­an could build on its plan? Maybe even alter the formula? How about even a tiny acknowledg­ment that Moe may be right — that there’s been no evidence the federal plan will actually reduce emissions?

Instead, we got what we always get when the Liberals come out West. They tossed a few bucks towards First Nations. They ignored the elected leadership. And then they tried to pretend this was somehow a reasoned, fruitful exchange. It wasn’t.

The Liberals needed to read the room. Or at least, they needed to acknowledg­e that rather large elephant sitting in the middle of it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada