Regina Leader-Post

Jurisdicti­on issue could end up before courts

Province tries to guard turf As First Nation opens pot shop

- DOUG CUTHAND

The Muscowpetu­ng Saulteaux Nation made the news this week and at least the news media are pronouncin­g the name the right way.

The band council is the centre of attention because it defied the provincial government’s pot laws and opened its own cannabis dispensary.

The provincial government maintains that the First Nation went ahead and opened its pot shop without a provincial licence. The First Nation, on the other hand, stated that it passed its own band legislatio­n with an 86-per-cent majority voting in favour.

The province wants the dispensary shut down, maintainin­g that it has jurisdicti­on over the regulation of cannabis.

The issue boils down to jurisdicti­on and the ability of a First Nation government to make laws within its territory. The Indian Act offers little to go on and it allows for only band bylaws, but this act is hopelessly outdated and First Nations have moved light years ahead of the colonial administra­tion.

Our elders have told us that we have the rights of a sovereign nation. I recall Sen. John Tootoosis telling us that we are a nation and we have the ability to govern ourselves. I recall other elders telling us that the reserve land that we hold today is not land that was given to us, but rather land that was held back when we made treaty. Reserve land is Indian land, and it was never a part of Canada.

In fact, while we have treaty rights as a result of signing the numbered treaties, we also have rights that were never part of the negotiatio­ns, and we retained them. In a contractua­l relationsh­ip, what was not negotiated is often just as important as the text of the agreement. Rights such as the right to our language, culture, traditions and religion were never discussed and were retained by us. We also retained the right to govern ourselves. We have the right to choose our leaders, administer our affairs and make laws for the good of the people.

Back in 1874 when the people signed Treaty 4, they were under the impression that they were going to share the land with the newcomers, and for a while it worked. But as more and more settlers arrived, people were restricted to reserves and the land base shrunk through land sales and surrenders pushed through by the Department of Indian Affairs.

Our people did not share in the wealth of the province, and instead languished in poverty with no access to resource revenue or the economic developmen­t that was growing all around them.

Instead, we were colonized and warehoused with the hope that somehow we would disappear. Our children’s education consisted of removing the “Indian” from their souls. We were never considered to be part of the new order but rather a vanishing race.

In 1900, there were about 10,000 First Nations people in Saskatchew­an. Today, our population exceeds 130,000. Collective­ly we constitute a population that would make us the third largest city in the province. We have gone from a vanishing race to the province’s future; however, we are stuck within a legislativ­e and colonial system that has its roots in the 1800s.

In any event, the case of the Muscowpetu­ng pot shop will most likely go to court. Instead of diplomacy and negotiatio­n we will have court and legislatio­n.

This isn’t a partisan case — remember when the NDP raided the Whitebear casino? The province jealously guards its turf, regardless of which party is in power. At that time the province realized that it would most likely lose a case based on jurisdicti­on, so it negotiated an agreement with the FSIN and today’s First Nations casinos are the result. The NDP weren’t willing to take the chance, but this is another case and we might well end up in court.

No matter the outcome in the end, we will continue to nibble around the fringes of the economy.

Casinos, tax-free cigarettes and pot shops don’t make an economy.

We must be able to use our profits and develop mainstream business ventures if we are to succeed and be real participan­ts in the province’s economy.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada