Alberta Appeal Court sides with Alberta on federal carbon tax
SASKATOON Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe brought renewed swagger as he addressed reporters Monday in Saskatoon following an Alberta Court of Appeal ruling declaring the federal carbon tax unconstitutional.
“Today’s ruling confirms that the federal government has no right to impose a carbon tax on some provinces but not others based on how each province has chosen to exercise its own legislative jurisdiction, as written under the constitution,” Moe said of the 4-1 ruling by Alberta’s highest court.
Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal shot down the Moe government’s own court challenge against the tax.
That split decision is being appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, as is a split decision in favour of the tax out of Ontario.
Moe said the Alberta case leaves him confident as his government heads to Canada’s highest court to once again challenge the tax.
Arguing that the two split decisions and the one ruling against the tax showed Ottawa’s case was far from a “slam dunk,” he urged Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to delay the tax until after the Supreme Court rules.
“Cancel your unconstitutional carbon tax on the hardworking people of the province of Saskatchewan,” Moe said.
The Alberta Court of Appeal gave opponents of the federal carbon tax their first win on Monday when it ruled that the levy is unconstitutional. In its decision, the court said the legislation that brought in the tax erodes provincial jurisdiction.
“The act is a constitutional Trojan Horse,” said a portion of the decision written by three of the four majority justices. “Almost every aspect of the provinces’ development and management of their natural resources ... would be subject to federal regulation.”
A fourth judge filed a separate opinion in support of the majority.
The Alberta government had argued in its challenge of the tax that climate change isn’t a national concern requiring overriding federal intervention.
A provincial lawyer said in hearings last December that if greenhouse gases could be considered such, then anything could.
The federal government countered by saying climate change is a national and global issue that can’t be left to each of the provinces to take on alone. Alberta Premier Jason Kenney welcomed the ruling.
“We will continue to stand with our allies in Ontario, Saskatchewan, Quebec and elsewhere in defending working families and defending our constitutional authority as a government,” he said.
“We expect the government of Canada to comply with the order of the court today and to remove the federal carbon tax on Albertans.”
The court ruling is a constitutional reference and contains no orders.
Federal Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson pointed out that Saskatchewan and Ontario appeal courts sided with the federal legislation. The Supreme Court is to hear arguments next month when Saskatchewan appeals the ruling from its court.
“We feel confident that the federal position will be upheld,” Wilkinson said in Ottawa. “We need to work together, but we need to do it in thoughtful ways that are efficient, that are affordable for Canadians and one of those ways is a price on pollution.”
Joshua Ginsberg, a law professor at the University of Ottawa who represented the David Suzuki Foundation at the hearing, said the Alberta court’s reasoning may not jive with that of the Supreme Court.
“The majority decision is trying to (dodge) around the Supreme Court jurisprudence on this issue, which does confirm that if there’s significant provincial inability to deal with a problem, the federal government can step in.”