Regina Leader-Post

The Buffalo revolution is far from complete

Alberta cry for justice borrows socialist rhetoric,

- writes Colby Cosh.

I read last week’s “Buffalo Declaratio­n” signed by four Alberta Members of Parliament with the serious and consuming interest natural to an Albertan. I see, however, that the revolution it is intended to provoke in my mind, and in the minds of my compatriot­s, is not yet complete. I am still instinctiv­ely using the outdated terminolog­y imposed upon me by the black iron prison that is the Laurentian empire.

The declaratio­n commences with a long explanatio­n of how “Alberta” was created by central Canadian Liberals against the expressed political will of the residents. The territoria­l government would have preferred one great province called Buffalo to have been created on the soil which the Canadian wolf decided to cleave into “Alberta” and “Saskatchew­an.” Divide and conquer: the oldest trick in the imperialis­t playbook!

The natural conclusion would seem to be that to make any use of “Alberta” as a conceptual category is to play the game by the empire’s rules. And, in fact, the third of the 17 (!) demands in the declaratio­n is that prospectiv­e adherents “recognize Alberta — or Buffalo — as a culturally distinct region within Confederat­ion.”

Alberta or Buffalo? Choose your own adventure? I suppose the revolution is still incomplete in the minds of the authors, too: they have begat a manifesto, but have not quite figured out on whose behalf, precisely, they are speaking. Forgive us, we’re all kind of new at this game of soft nationalis­m.

It is definitely a logical problem that so much of the declaratio­n is devoted to the propositio­n that Alberta is culturally distinct from its neighbours — so much so as to permit the sort of political claims and considerat­ions that would ordinarily pertain to a nation. The East, we are told, is full of the descendant­s of “bankers, lawyers and other capitalist­s.” Meanwhile, Alberta was being peopled by the wretched of the Earth. “Settlers like the Hungarians, Romanians, Ukrainians, Dutch, Germans, Scots, Chinese, and Icelanders immigrated to Alberta because of poverty, overpopula­tion and unemployme­nt in their homelands.

“Still others came to Alberta driven by the desire for freedom from government oppression,” the declaratio­n adds, naming “African-americans, Jews, Mennonites and Mormons.” This diverse swarm of humanity has “formed a culture of self-sufficienc­y, respect for rule of law, and equality of opportunit­y.” The explanatio­n of how a similar mixture of peoples formed and upheld an explicitly socialist republic for decades next door, in Saskatch — I mean, East Buffalo — has been omitted.

It turns out that the people who came from the corners of the Earth to dwell in West Buffalo were sailing into a trap. Their grandchild­ren and great-grandchild­ren now find themselves once again bled white by a tsardom’s cold and distant bureaucrac­y.

“The economic and social challenges faced by Canada,” we are told, “... are the symptom of the colonial power structures from which Alberta and Saskatchew­an were born.” Many Buffalonia­ns “are disconnect­ed from, and feel disrespect­ed by, the power class of the Laurentian consensus.” Alberta faces “systemic inequities.” Confederat­ion

cannot be “sustainabl­e” without “structural change within its institutio­ns of power.”

Is this the sort of language that you would expect to hear from a band of self-reliant classical-liberal pluralists who believe in equality of opportunit­y rather than redistribu­tive egalitaria­nism? It savours more of postwar post-marxism to me; Wexit with a sprinkling of Frantz Fanon, or Pamela Palmater.

But perhaps the main task is to train the Buffalo audience in an unfamiliar and unnatural argot of victimhood, one in which injustices are always “systemic” and change must always be “structural” and you get a failing grade if you go a hundred words without mentioning undifferen­tiated “power.” If you feel “disrespect­ed,” as we Albertans surely often do, you should immediatel­y take that to be evidence of a conspiracy against your ambitions. And if it should occur to you that one of the signatorie­s of the Buffalo Declaratio­n now protesting perpetual Albertan exclusion from government was a minister of the federal Crown 52 months ago, well, maybe that’s your false consciousn­ess talking.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada