Regina Leader-Post

First Nations need new approach to housing

- DOUG CUTHAND Doug Cuthand is the Indigenous affairs columnist for the Saskatoon Starphoeni­x and the Regina Leader-post. He is a member of Little Pine First Nation.

First Nations infrastruc­ture is woefully inadequate according to a report released by the Assembly of First Nations. The report says the government will require $350 billion to close the gap by the target year of 2030.

The research for the report was done by the AFN along with support from Indigenous Services Canada and it reveals that First Nations continue to have a shortage and, in some cases, a lack of infrastruc­ture support.

Infrastruc­ture refers to public buildings and services such as schools, social services including childcare, elders care and clinics. Also, roads, power lines, sewer systems and safe water, to name some examples.

Today, there are 31 First Nations communitie­s that continue to live under water drinking advisories. The housing shortfall nationally sits at approximat­ely $135 billion.

To bring Indigenous infrastruc­ture in line with the rest of the country would require an additional $135 billion for housing. On top of that, according to the report, an additional $209 billion is required for other infrastruc­ture.

The consequenc­es are serious as water-borne diseases continue to plague many communitie­s, substandar­d and crowded school buildings deliver poor quality education. And, sadly, the report states that Indigenous and First Nations children are 86 times more likely to die in a fire.

The infrastruc­ture requiremen­ts should be broken down into categories. Schools and health and social services were promised under the treaties. Clean water is a health requiremen­t and therefore required under the spirit and intent of the treaties.

Social service infrastruc­ture includes elders' lodges, childcare, drug and alcohol rehabilita­tion, and safe houses for abused women and family members. But when it comes to infrastruc­ture in First Nations communitie­s the real elephant in the room is housing.

Currently, on most First Nations, all the housing stock is owned by the First Nation and assigned to individual­s. This has created a situation where the chief and council are not able to keep up with the demand and are falling further and further behind every year.

In Saskatchew­an, the First Nations population has doubled since the year 2000 and is destined to double again by the year 2040. We will never meet our housing needs at this rate. There is clearly a need for another approach and that is private ownership of housing.

We used to have private ownership. I recall as a child in the 1950s people would build their homes from logs, and some were quite nice. They had multiple rooms and many had a second storey. They were plastered with mud, and many were whitewashe­d.

The government began to provide housing for people in need and gradually the old log homes were replaced with more modern frame dwellings.

To catch up, First Nations will have to develop policies to support individual home ownership. For public housing, priority should be given to elders, single parents and the handicappe­d. People who are financiall­y independen­t should not receive public housing.

First Nations home ownership is different than off-reserve home ownership.

Indigenous land is held in common by the First Nation and cannot be encumbered or pledged against a loan.

It can, however, be leased for up to 99 years and then leased again. On most reserves people live in family groups, so there is a de facto ownership of the land through traditiona­l tenure.

A home on a reserve is not an investment in the traditiona­l sense. It can only be sold to another member of the First Nation. Land ownership has been cited for years as the impediment to home ownership.

There are examples where land is leased and people still build homes. National parks are an example. The land is leased from the government and yet people still build on the property.

There is a need for a change in attitude for the developmen­t of individual property on a First Nation. Home ownership is possible, but it must have a different value placed on it. It must be seen as a legacy and not an investment.

Otherwise, we will never catch up to our housing needs.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada