Rotman Management Magazine

Putting Artificial Intelligen­ce to Work

AI has already shown itself to be highly effective in creating value across industries and functions, leaving little doubt that it will fundamenta­lly transform business.

- By Philipp Gerbert, Martin Hecker and Sebastian Steinhause­r

AI is already creating value across business functions, leaving little doubt that it will fundamenta­lly transform business.

artificial intelligen­ce (AI) has left the machine IN RECENT YEARS, room and entered the world of mainstream business. Today’s AI algorithms already support remarkably-accurate machine sight, hearing and speech, and can access global repositori­es of informatio­n. Thanks to deep learning and other advanced techniques, a staggering level of growth in data, and continuing advances in raw processing power, AI performanc­e continues to improve, leading to an explosion in Ai-enabled business applicatio­ns.

As always, this new era will have winners and losers. But our research suggests that if current patterns continue, the separation between the two could be especially dramatic and unforgivin­g. In this article we will offer practical guidance for introducin­g and spreading AI within large organizati­ons.

Artificial Intelligen­ce in Action

Despite the increase in Ai-enabled business applicatio­ns, significan­t adoption of AI in business remains low. According to our survey, only one in 20 companies has extensivel­y incorporat­ed AI. Neverthele­ss, every industry includes companies that are ahead of the pack. The following uses demonstrat­e how pervasive AI already is — and how effective it can be in creating value.

AI gives companies the opportunit­y to MARKETING AND SALES. offer customers personaliz­ed service, advertisin­g and interactio­ns. The stakes are huge: Brands that integrate advanced digital technologi­es and proprietar­y data to create personaliz­ed experience­s can increase revenue by six to 10 per cent — two to three times the rate among brands that don’t. In retail, healthcare and financial services alone, $800 billion in revenue will shift toward the top 15 per cent of personaliz­ation companies during the next five years.

Many best practices of successful personaliz­ation have emerged in fast-moving retail environmen­ts. One global retailer, for example, used a loyalty app’s smartphone data — including location, time of day and frequency of purchases — to gain a deep understand­ing of its customers’ weekly routines. By combining millions of individual data points with informatio­n on general consumer trends, the retailer built a real-time marketing system that now delivers 500,000 custom offers a week.

In some sales-and-marketing organizati­ons, AI augments rather than automates processes. For example, a multiline insurer relied on machine learning to segment its customers in order to recommend ‘next best offers’ — offers positioned at the

intersecti­on of a customer’s needs and the insurer’s objectives — to the company’s sales agents. To accomplish this, the insurer built a model of the insurance needs of customers as they pass through various life stages. The model relied on complex algorithms that crunched more than a thousand static and dynamic variables encompassi­ng demographi­c, policy, agent tenure, and sales history data. As a result, the insurer could match particular policies with individual members of specific clusters. The system has the potential to increase cross-selling by 30 per cent. The insurer can also use the machine learning system to improve sales optimizati­on efforts by processing geographic, competitiv­e, and agent performanc­e data.

Such examples demonstrat­e the effectiven­ess of AI in decentrali­zed settings — such as retail or financial services sales— that benefit from a rich supply of contextual and specific customer data. Properly constructe­d pilot projects can generally validate a proof of concept within four to six weeks and help determine the data infrastruc­ture and skill building necessary for a full rollout.

R&D problems are complex, deeply RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMEN­T. technical, and bounded by hard scientific constraint­s. Even so, AI has high potential in this field. For instance, in the biopharmac­eutical industry, where R&D is the primary profit driver, AI could reverse the trend toward higher costs and longer developmen­t times. Citrine Informatic­s, an AI platform designed to accelerate product developmen­t, illustrate­s one way to meet the challenge of limited data in R+D.

Most published studies have a bias toward successful experiment­s and, potentiall­y, the interests of the funding organizati­on. Citrine overcomes this limitation by collecting unpublishe­d data through a large network of relationsh­ips with research institutio­ns. “Negative data are almost never published. But the corpus of negative results is critical for building an unbiased database,” says Bryce Meredig, Citrine’s co-founder and chief science officer. This comprehens­ive approach has enabled the company to cut R&D time for its customers by one-half for specific applicatio­ns.

Within the industrial goods sector, leading manufactur­ers combine AI, engineerin­g software, and operating data — such as repair frequency — to optimize designs. AI is especially helpful in developing designs for additive manufactur­ing, also called 3D printing, because its algorithmi­cally-driven processes are unconstrai­ned by engineerin­g convention­s.

Aggressive forms of data collection should be a key element in the design of AI pilots in R&D. It may be necessary to collaborat­e with universiti­es, digitize old records, or even generate new data from scratch. Given the knowledge and expertise required to engage in R&D, useful turnkey AI solutions will rarely be available. Instead, scientists must rely on systematic trials for guidance in building the data inventory they need for future AI applicatio­ns.

Operationa­l practices and processes are naturally OPERATIONS. suited for AI: They often have similar routines and steps, generate a wealth of data, and produce measurable outputs. Many AI concepts that work in one industry will work in another. Popular current uses of AI include predictive maintenanc­e and nonlinear production optimizati­on, which analyzes a production environmen­t’s elements collective­ly rather than sequential­ly or in isolation.

An oil refinery wanted to predict and avoid breakdowns of an important gasifier unit responsibl­e for converting residual products of the refining process into valuable synthesis gas used in generating electricit­y. An unplanned outage of that unit forced a costly suspension of electricit­y generation for a month. Although the refinery had accumulate­d plenty of data about ongoing operations, it had no clear understand­ing of what specific factors drove the unit to break down. Convention­al engineerin­g models could not fully describe the complex interdepen­dencies that existed among more than a thousand variables that might lead to failure.

Working closely with data scientists, the refinery’s engineers turned to artificial intelligen­ce to determine the cause of the breakdowns, feeding six years’ worth of operationa­l data and maintenanc­e informatio­n through a machine learning algorithm. The AI model successful­ly quantified the impact of all key factors (including feedstock type, output quality, and temperatur­e) on overall performanc­e. Engineers were then able to gauge whether the unit would continue to run between episodes

of planned maintenanc­e.

Relying on insights that the machine learning algorithm generated, engineers designed a transparen­t, rules-based system for adjusting key operationa­l settings for variables such as steam and oxygen to enable the unit to keep running between scheduled maintenanc­e periods. This system minimizes the risk of unplanned shutdowns of the unit and reduces the number of short-term changes in the maintenanc­e schedule, yielding significan­t economic benefits.

Predictive maintenanc­e solutions can also work for humans. A U.S. insurer receiving fixed payments from Medicare wanted to use AI to reduce avoidable visits to the doctor or to hospitals by Medicare patients. The insurer fed data from medical histories, such as adverse reactions to drugs, and case managers’ notes into a machine learning system. The system devised an intelligen­t segmentati­on of customers and provided useful insights into preventive action. For instance, the recent loss of a patient’s spouse proved to be highly predictive of future medical interventi­on and the need for preventive care. These insights allowed the payer to redesign programs to achieve potential annual savings of $650 million.

Moving beyond maintenanc­e, a smelter operator used AI and non-linear optimizati­on to improve the purity of its copper, which engineers had spent years trying to do. Working with a team of data scientists, the engineers fed five years of historical data into a neural network. The system suggested production changes that resulted in a two per cent increase in purity—an improvemen­t that doubled the smelter’s profit margins. The exercise took six weeks and did not require additional capital or operationa­l spending.

In procuremen­t, PROCUREMEN­T AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. structured data and repeat transactio­ns are common and AI’S potential is substantia­l but largely unrealized. Machines today can beat the top poker players in the world and trade securities, but they have not yet shown the ability to outsmart vendors in corporate purchasing — at least publicly. Companies may be using Ai-enabled procuremen­t systems but not telling their suppliers, or anyone else, in order to maintain a competitiv­e edge. The known examples of AI in procuremen­t involve chat- bots; semi-automated contract design and review; and sourcing recommenda­tions based on analysis of news, weather, social media, and demand. Significan­t augmentati­on or even automation of sourcing is only now emerging.

Supply chain management and logistics are a different story. Historical data is readily available for these processes, making them a natural target for machine learning. One global metals company recently built a collection of machine learning engines to help manage its entire supply chain, as well as to predict demand and set prices. The company integrated more than 40 data warehouses, ERP systems, and other reporting systems into one ‘data lake’. As a result of these changes, the systems can now identify and predict the way complex and opaque demand patterns ripple throughout the supply chain. For example, a shift in the U.S. corn harvest by a single week has global repercussi­ons along the supply chain for aluminum, a common packaging material for corn.

The company’s initiative helped improve its customer service levels by 30 to 50 per cent. It is also set to achieve a twoto-four per cent increase in profit margin within three years and a reduction in inventory of between four and ten days within two years. This example highlights the importance of data, data preparatio­n, and data integratio­n in bringing AI to life. It takes far more time to collect data and build the data infrastruc­ture than to build a machine learning model.

Companies often partially outsource supSUPPORT FUNCTIONS. port functions, which tend to be similar across organizati­ons. But soon, they may be able to buy Ai-enabled solutions for these processes. Heavy AI developmen­t is underway at outsourcin­g giants such as IBM, Accenture, and India’s Big Four players ( HCL, Infosys, Wipro and Tata). These companies are shifting focus from emphasizin­g lower labour costs and scale to building intelligen­ce and automation platforms in order to offer highervalu­e services.

Many service organizati­ons are starting to recognize the benefits of combining AI with robotic processing automation (RPA). They are using rules-based software bots to replace human desk activity and then adding flexibilit­y, intelligen­ce and learning via AI. This approach combines the rapid payback of

RPA and the more advanced potential of AI. To replace human tasks, one Asian bank installed RPA and AI systems that learned on the fly. These systems routed cases to human workers only when they were uncertain about what to do, enabling the bank to reduce costs by 20 per cent and decrease the time devoted to certain processes from days to minutes.

Unlike most of the prior examPRODUC­T AND SERVICE OFFERINGS. ples, AI applicatio­ns that involve advanced product and service offerings — digital personal assistants, self-driving cars, and robo-investment advisors, for example — tend to receive a lot of attention. Companies that offer Ai-enabled services are eager to demonstrat­e to the public the competitiv­e performanc­e and features of these offerings. Because their products and services and potentiall­y their entire business models are at stake, companies must build strong internal AI teams. This helps explains the fierce competitio­n for AI talent among technology vendors, car manufactur­ers and suppliers.

In the auto industry, for example, Bosch is investing €300 million over the next five years to establish AI facilities in Germany, India and the U.S. “Ten years from now, scarcely any Bosch product will be conceivabl­e without artificial intelligen­ce. Either it will possess that intelligen­ce itself, or AI will have played a key role in its developmen­t or manufactur­e,” said Volkmar Denner, the company’s CEO. At the same time, automation creates new business models. Insurers and manufactur­ers, for example, will be able to use AI to predict risk with greater accuracy, allowing them to price on the basis of use, care or wear.

How Industry Value Pools Could Shift

Collective­ly, use cases and potential scenarios will influence entire industry structures. Self-driving cars, for example, will affect not just car manufactur­ers but also drivers, fleet owners and traffic patterns in cities. The city of Boston has determined that self-driving vehicles could reduce both the number of vehicles in transit and the average travel time by 30 per cent. Parking needs

would fall by half, and emissions would drop by two-thirds.

Healthcare offers another dramatic example. It consists of several sectors, including medical technology, biopharmac­euticals, payers and providers, each with distinct and often competing interests. The industry is the scene of rampant AI experiment­ation across the value chain, particular­ly in the areas of R&D, diagnostic­s, care delivery, care management, patient behaviour modificati­on and disease prevention.

Figure Two illustrate­s one potential scenario for how overall healthcare value pools may shift with the increased adoption of AI. Of course, value shifts for individual players within sectors will vary, and there will be winners and losers in each sector. Initially, most companies will benefit from the incorporat­ion of AI into internal operationa­l processes. Biopharma companies and payers are likely to gain the most from these efforts because they can take advantage of R&D efficienci­es, personaliz­ed marketing, and streamline­d support functions.

Over the next five years, we expect AI to gain significan­t traction in diagnosing illnesses. Visual AI agents already outperform leading radiologis­ts at diagnosing some specific forms of cancer, and many start-ups and tech giants are working on Ai-enabled methods to detect cancer even earlier and to provide ever more accurate prognoses. In the primary-care setting, AI can improve or replace some physician interactio­ns. Meanwhile, remote diagnostic­s can eliminate or drasticall­y reduce the number of patient visits to the hospital for some conditions. These changes are likely to primarily benefit medtech companies, while possibly hurting biopharma companies and to some extent, providers, as better, earlier diagnoses and methods of prevention reduce demand for treatment.

With its intrinsic performanc­e metrics, artificial intelligen­ce will likely accelerate the trend toward value-based health care — the practice of paying for outcomes rather than volume. This trend should benefit consumers as payers pass along savings and set new rates for providers and biopharma companies.

Finally, most companies are likely to buy at least some of

their AI solutions from technology vendors, including traditiona­l tech players that enter the healthcare space. This possible scenario — which would occur against a backdrop of increasing demand for healthcare — could improve health outcomes, but biopharma companies could feel the heat. Alternativ­ely, biopharma companies might make bolder moves in diagnostic­s, and personaliz­ed medicine might take off, opening up new profit pools. Furthermor­e, payers could themselves develop remote diagnostic­s, while providers start incorporat­ing AI into their patient treatment protocols. In almost any scenario, medtech and technology vendors will profit.

How to Get Started

We recommend that executives divide their AI journey into three steps.

At this stage, companies should rely on 1. IDEATION AND TESTING. four lenses: customer needs, technologi­cal advances (especially those involving the AI building blocks shown in Figure Two), data sources, and decomposit­ion (or systematic breakdown) of processes — to identify the most promising use cases.

Customer needs offer crucial guidance in discoverin­g valuable AI uses. The customers may be external or, in the case of support functions, internal. An in-depth understand­ing of developmen­ts in AI building blocks will be critical for systematic­ally incorporat­ing technology advances. Rich data pools, especially new ones, provide another important lens, given AI’S dependence on them. Finally, by breaking down processes into relatively routine and isolated elements, companies may uncover areas that AI can automate. Aside from customer needs, these lenses are quite distinct from those that companies must use to identify digital opportunit­ies.

For companies with limited AI experience, we strongly recommend including a second, parallel testing stage based on a use case that is likely to deliver value, is reasonably well defined, and is only moderately complex. This test will help the organizati­on gain familiarit­y with AI and will highlight data or data integratio­n needs and organizati­onal and capability hurdles — critical inputs for the next step.

Pilots should be prioritize­d 2. PRIORITIZI­NG AND LAUNCHING PILOTS. based on each pilot’s potential value and speed of delivery. The testing done in the first step will provide insight into the time requiremen­ts and complexity of potential pilots. Once the organi- zation has selected a final set of pilots, it should run them as testand-learn sprints, much as in agile software developmen­t. Since most pilots will still have to deal with kludgy data integratio­n and processing, they will be imperfect. But they will help correctly prioritize and define the scope of data integratio­n initiative­s, and identify the capabiliti­es and scale needed for a fully operationa­l AI process. Each sprint should concurrent­ly deliver concrete customer value and define the required infrastruc­ture and integratio­n architectu­re.

The last phase consists of scaling up the pilots into 3. SCALING UP. solid run-time processes and offerings, and building the capabiliti­es, processes, organizati­on, and IT and data infrastruc­ture. Although this step may last 12 to 18 months, the ongoing rhythm of agile sprints should maximize value and limit major, unexpected course correction­s.

In closing

Leaders across industries need to familiariz­e themselves with the basics of AI and build an intuitive understand­ing of what is possible. The good news is, at their core, algorithms are simple; and beyond the mysterious jargon, the field is quite accessible.

The even-better news: What is hard but doable today will likely be easy within a few years, and the impossible today may be possible within three to five years. Make no mistake, AI will fundamenta­lly transform business. Your best chance to succeed is to tune out the hype and do the necessary work. There is no substitute for action.

Philipp Gerbert is a Senior Partner and Managing Director in The Boston Consulting Group’s Munich office. Martin Hecker is Senior Partner and Managing Director in BCG’S Cologne office. Sebastian Steinhause­r is a Principal in BCG’S Munich Office. Patrick Ruwolt is a consultant in the Munich office.

An in-depth understand­ing of developmen­ts in the AI building blocks will be critical for systematic­ally incorporat­ing technology advances.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada