Rotman Management Magazine

Challenges and Opportunit­ies Post- COVID

Moving forward will depend on the recognitio­n that there is no going back to old ways of doing things.

- By Anita M. Mcgahan and Jason Sukhram

the reopening of the economy, the AS BUSINESSES CONTEMPLAT­E only thing that seems certain is that a lot will be different. Many executives have expressed a desire to ‘do the right thing’. But what is the right thing? How do you plan without knowing even broad parameters on what will occur, such as when a vaccine will be available, and what the timetable looks like for the lifting of all restrictio­ns?

In this article, we take on these questions and try to offer the best answers that we can, given what we know now. A critical facet of our approach is to use the United Nation’s Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals as a north star for where value can be created during and post COVID.

A Shared Priority

As the economy reopens, the first priority for every organizati­on must be to preserve health and safety unambiguou­sly and with full commitment of resources and capabiliti­es. A wide range of interventi­ons are required to make workspaces safe. Physical distancing floor markers, plexiglass dividers and hand sanitizing stations are now standard business needs. Companies must ensure that workers have appropriat­e PPE, while also adapting to deliver any services virtually so that face-to-face interactio­n with customers is as limited as possible until a vaccine is available. These and other immediate approaches to physical distancing are clearly imperative and will need to be thought through by every employer.

We must also go to the mat to produce products and services to stop COVID. Inspiring companies around the world have stepped up in recent months by converting activities and chanelling resources on the COVID- critical agenda. Distilleri­es and breweries, including Anheuser-busch and Diageo, are producing hand sanitizer. Canada Goose, Nike, New Balance, Gap and a countless number of small and medium-sized clothing companies are making PPE for healthcare workers. General Motors, Ford and Dyson are making ventilator­s. The New England Patriots’ plane travelled to China to transport N95 respirator­s to Massachuse­tts. Sports franchises around the world continue to provide financial support to non-working event staff. Restaurant­s are donating food, shoes, PPE and other supplies to front-line workers in grocery, transporta­tion, distributi­on and healthcare. Each of these acts of solidarity will long be remembered.

Prioritizi­ng health and safety also carries other responsibi­lities for companies that may be less obvious. Government­s may ask organizati­ons to implement testing and to send workers home if they appear to be contagious. Employers will have to be ready to adapt quickly to departures from the workplace by critical workers who test positive on-site. The potential for prior contagion will have to be addressed based on what those workers were doing in the days prior to detection. Some organizati­ons are developing A, B and C teams for work rotations to create defensive capacity, but the duplicatio­n of responsibi­lity is expensive and inefficien­t. Companies will have to take

steps commensura­te with the risk of onsite contagion to others. As many employees without immunity continue to work from home, replacing the sent-home worker will be complicate­d and sometimes impossible. All of this will delay a business’s ability to re-establish a sense of normalcy and rebuild towards continuity. Companies like Twitter and Shopify have responded by institutin­g permanent work-from-home policies, while others have embraced a phased approach while contemplat­ing, planning for and intensivel­y managing these issues, and other issues like them.

The Implicatio­ns of Changes in Stakeholde­r Behaviour

In the months ahead, companies both large and small will also confront other types of disruption­s in demand, supply chains, financial burdens, government­al interventi­on and employee needs. The simple experience of spending less during lockdown has left many of us wondering why we wasted so much money on things that no longer seem important. For many, the loss of a job or of a family member’s job has created intense budgetary pressure. Permanent changes in consumer behaviour are likely.

The financial burdens arising from the shutdown are likely to be extensive, and will include the renegotiat­ion of contracts and a restructur­ing of obligation­s that will have an impact on consumer demand through other routes. Supply chains — infamously fragile in producing PPE at the height of the pandemic — must now also contend with new kinds of restrictio­ns on internatio­nal trading behaviour that will affect costs and prices. Government­al interventi­on is not only likely to intensify, but conflicts, tensions, and issues may arise in the demands of local, provincial, federal, and internatio­nal authoritie­s. As a result, shortages may arise and persist.

Changes in employee needs will also arise from the pandemic’s enormous psychologi­cal and social toll, including from loss of loved ones, jobs, savings, stability, and interactio­n with others. The mental health of those working from home or simply remaining inside has worsened. Workers in essential industries are, of course, exhausted with consequenc­es from COVID that will be revealed only after periods of months and years. Without question, COVID has put an intense spotlight on systemic income and racial inequaliti­es.

As the economy reopens and these demands intensify, leaders will look for a way forward. A recent Boston Consulting Group report suggests that now is not the time for precise budgeting and forecastin­g, but rather a time for scenario planning. Mckinsey authors emphasize that the future for business will require resilience and the ability to withstand intense government scrutiny, demand shocks, privacy concerns and sectoral disruption.

Figuring out the right approach for your organizati­on will depend on discerning which stakeholde­rs to serve, how to serve them, and where to draw boundaries as to what is possible. Some analysts are suggesting that the economic landscape is ending a 75-year cycle that began during the Great Depression, and that we should expect a whole new economic system to emerge — one that reflects the values of humanism, collaborat­ion, equity, and a different kind of globalizat­ion.

Dealing with all of this is daunting. How do you even begin — especially while facing resource constraint­s, a fragile workforce and reluctant customers? Research in the fields of strategic management and organizati­onal behaviour points unambiguou­sly to the best place to begin: All business leaders looking for a way forward for their organizati­ons must reconsider their missions, purposes and goals over a time horizon aligned with the process of re-emergence.

For many companies, this will mean looking ahead several years. Critically, effective goal-setting requires imagining how the organizati­on will adapt to what we’re now thinking of as a ‘new normal’ that involves much more than persistent social distancing. COVID- 19 has pulled the plug on the accumulati­ng pressure of climate change, de-globalizat­ion, rampant insecurity, structural inequality and unsustaina­ble consumeris­m. As the economy reopens, the companies that prosper will be those that assess their resources and envision effectivel­y how to meet the needs of stakeholde­rs relentless­ly during the forthcomin­g period of turbulence in most industries.

One place to look for answers on how to accomplish this is in the United Nation’s Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals (SDGS). These are 17 major goals ( see sidebar) developed over a period of study that involved extensive consultati­on with stakeholde­rs from around the world, supported by expert analysis. They focus on addressing social developmen­t issues (via goals 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8), and they provide a roadmap for combating inequality (via goals 5 and 10). They address the major environmen­tal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada