Climate change is not debatable

At some point you, the editors, must provide an explanation to your readers as to why you continue to publish letters from individuals denying climate change.

It cannot be an effort to provide a balance of opinion — there is no counter point — this issue is not debatable. Human induced climate change is fact.

So, why keep publishing letters from people who argue from personal beliefs while ignoring facts?

If you continue this path, you should consider letters defending astrology as a science, and those who counter evolution with intelligent design, and those who believe the phases of the moon affect individual behaviour.

I believe you publish these letters because you get some action in the “letters to the editor section,” and that is sad — please tell me I’m wrong.

Glenn Pancyr, Saskatoon