Trump’s view of trade with Canada unbalanced
On a per-capita basis, we’re America’s best customer, writes Bradley Parkes.
It’s clear that U.S. President Donald Trump thinks the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is unfair to the United States. He believes trade should balance. It’s a misguided view.
The president is obviously persuaded by images. He was convinced to launch strikes against Syria and to maintain troops in Afghanistan based on pictures. So you wonder if he derives his view of trade from popular film. The view that trade must balance seems eerily similar to the economic structure of post-apocalyptic nation Panem in the movie The Hunger Games. In that fictional world, the Capitol sends goods to the 12 districts for the exact amount of resources they send back.
We often try to compare nations on a per-capita basis. Economists use gross domestic product (GDP) per capita to rank the wealth of nations. Environmental organizations use emissions per capita to compare environmental impact. Criminologists use violent crime per 100,000 people to determine the safety of nations. Even hotels, a business Trump understands, use a metric called revenue per available room (RevPAR) to compare hotel profitability.
We do this to normalize the comparisons. It allows smaller and larger nations (or larger and smaller hotels) to be compared on an even basis.
So why not evaluate trade deals using per-capita data (all figures in American dollars?) In 2015, the U.S. exported $280.3 billion in goods to Canada and imported $295.2 billion in goods from its northern neighbour. The total value of this trade partnership is $575.5 billion.
America has a $14.9-billion trade deficit with Canada. That deficit represents
2.6 per cent of the total trade.
However, the U.S. economy is much larger than the Canadian economy. In 2016, it had a nominal value of $18.56 trillion while the Canadian economy was valued at $1.53 trillion. The U.S. economy is 12.5 times the size of the Canadian economy, yet trade is almost balanced.
The U.S. also has a larger population at 323.1 million versus 36.29 million for Canada (2016 numbers). The U.S. population is
8.9 times the size of the Canadian population, yet trade is almost balanced.
Total U.S. trade with all nations in 2016 equated to $2.2 trillion in exports and $2.7 trillion in imports. When removing the value of Canadian trade from the total, the U.S. imported $2.405 trillion in goods and exported $1.92 trillion. The global population, not including Canada and the U.S., is .1 billion people. Yet Canada receives 13.4 per cent of all U.S. exports.
When these numbers are adjusted by per capita, the average Canadian buys $7,723.89 in American goods a year and the average American buys $913.65 of Canadian goods. If we extract Canada from American trade numbers and look at U.S. trade per capita with the rest of world, the average American imports $7,443.51 worth of goods while each international customer buys $270.42 worth of U.S. products.
Canadians buy 8.45 times more goods per person from the U.S. than the U.S. imports from Canada. And Canadians buy more on a per-capita basis than the U.S. buys from the rest of the world.
Using these metrics, Canadians appear to be the best customer in the world.
Maybe Trump’s protectionist policies restore some American manufacturing jobs. But if you chase away your customers, you just produce goods for no reason.
For Canada, eliminating NAFTA would be painful at first, but Canadians could redirect that $7,723.89 worth of goods internally to the businesses that are created to replace American imports or from new foreign sources as Canada continues to sign trade agreements.
But this isn’t the best outcome for either nation. The self-sufficient notion of autarky has proven to be inefficient and costly. Canadian prices would likely rise and the benefit to American producers would likely be smaller than Trump claims.
In his business ventures, does Trump alienate his best customer? A customer who spends 8.45 times what Trump spends on his or her business? Would Trump be worth as much if he ran his golf courses or hotels this way? It’s no way to run a country’s trade.