Saskatoon StarPhoenix

SECOND LIBERAL SLAMS JOB CLAUSE

Requiremen­t to attest to Charter called ‘lamentable’

- Brian Platt

OTTAWA • In a letter to an employer in his Ontario riding, a Liberal MP says his own government is wrongly invoking the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on its controvers­ial Canada Summer Jobs attestatio­n, and calls the whole thing “regrettabl­e” and a “lamentable state of affairs.”

The newly added clause requires applicants for the grant program to declare their core mandate respects “the values underlying the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” and goes on to specifical­ly mention reproducti­ve rights, which means access to abortions.

“In my riding of Scarboroug­h-Guildwood, I am personally aware of a number of organizati­ons negatively impacted,” says the letter from John McKay, who is known to be pro-life.

“I consider this to be a lamentable state of affairs, and have expressed my views both inside and outside caucus in the strongest possible terms.”

The employer, who runs a publishing business and provided the letter on condition his name not be used, had written to McKay four times to express dismay over the attestatio­n.

McKay responded on March 21, and begins the letter by saying the Charter was created with two critical components: to protect the citizen from the state and to provide a mechanism to balance competing rights.

“The converse of these two critical components is therefore that the Charter was not designed for the state to claim protection from the citizen and that it was not designed to promote one right over any other right,” McKay’s letter says.

“It is my view that the current government has inadverten­tly fallen into the trap of preferenci­ng one right over another and of using the Charter to protect itself from perceived abuse by citizens.

“The attestatio­n clause is a regrettabl­e example of that error. It is my view that applicatio­ns for government grants that engage in nonpolitic­al non-activist work should be free of ideologica­l bias and political preference.”

On March 19, the House of Commons voted down a Conservati­ve motion that said non-political, non-activist groups should have access to the summer jobs grants regardless of the attestatio­n. Only one Liberal MP in attendance voted against it, Newfoundla­nd’s Scott Simms, who had previously said he opposed the attestatio­n.

In his letter, McKay says he chose not to attend the vote after conferring with Liberal caucus whip Pablo Rodriguez, whose office is responsibl­e for party discipline on votes.

“I intentiona­lly absented myself from the vote on Monday after much discussion with the Whip’s office,” the letter concludes. “This entire process, in my judgment, is a regrettabl­e error, and I hope it will not be repeated.”

McKay, who is currently travelling overseas, declined to comment on the letter.

This is not McKay’s first clash with his party since Justin Trudeau became leader. In 2014, after Trudeau stated that new Liberal MPs must be pro-choice, McKay was caught on tape musing that the edict may have been a “bozo eruption” and hadn’t been fully thought through.

McKay later apologized and Trudeau made peace with him, calling McKay “a good man and a good friend.”

The Conservati­ve motion caused upheaval in the NDP, after Hamilton MP David Christophe­rson broke ranks with his caucus to vote in favour. The pro-choice MP told the National Post he felt the attestatio­n “took away Canadians’ right to disagree with the laws that they have to obey.”

Christophe­rson was punished by being removed from his position as vice-chair of the Commons procedure committee, but NDP leader Jagmeet Singh reversed that punishment after outcry from his caucus.

Last week, Simms told the National Post he was still “in discussion” with the whip’s office over his dissenting vote. Simms chairs the fisheries and oceans committee, while McKay chairs the public safety and national security committee.

Controvers­y over the attestatio­n has boiled since January, with numerous religious organizati­ons saying they can’t sign the attestatio­n in good conscience — despite the government’s attempt to clarify that “core mandate” refers only to activities, not beliefs or values. Statistics suggest more than 1,400 organizati­ons were rejected over the attestatio­n this year.

Trudeau and Employment Minister Patty Hajdu have stood their ground and made it clear the attestatio­n will not be changed this year. A constituti­onal challenge launched by an anti-abortion group is scheduled to be heard in Federal Court on June 19.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada