Still too many barriers
Actors with disabilities being overlooked in Hollywood’s push for diversity
Eileen Grubba was working alongside other actors on a TV commercial when she realized the director’s eye was caught by her uneven gait. He started positioning her out of shots — and then it got worse.
Shooting a scene on a bus, the director ordered Grubba to get up and move from her seat in the middle to one in the rear that was fully out of the frame.
“‘ So now we’re going to make the disabled people sit at the back of the bus? That’s awesome,’ ” Grubba, who uses a leg brace because of childhood spinal cord damage, recalled thinking some six years ago.
The disheartening experience reflects the broader picture for many performers with disabilities, whose progress in Hollywood has lagged behind that of other minority performers demanding to be seen and hired. The reasons are complex, insiders and observers say, including unfounded concerns about added production costs, disability stereotypes and an industry clinging to entrenched habits.
“The fact is this is the largest minority group in the United States that routinely is discriminated against in the (entertainment) industry, and we’re trying to move the needle,” said Jay Ruderman, head of a non-partisan foundation that advocates for inclusion for people with disabilities.
There are some high-profile successes on TV, among them wheelchair-using actor Daryl Mitchell on CBS’s NCIS: New Orleans; Micah Fowler, who has cerebral palsy and stars on ABC’s Speechless; and little person Peter Dinklage, the Emmy- and Golden Globe-winning star of HBO’s Game of Thrones.
But studies show them to be outliers, even as a diversity groundswell has benefited actors of colour and African-Americans in particular.
LGBTQ performers, among them Laverne Cox, are making gains in visibility and work as well.
BY THE NUMBERS
More than 56 million people — nearly 20 per cent of the U.S. population — have a disability, according to a 2012 Census Bureau report. (Rates in Canada are comparable, at more than five million.) But in 900 films released in theatres between 2007 and 2016, a total of 2.7 per cent of the characters with speaking parts had a disability, according to researchers at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
Of the 20 characters with disabilities tallied on the 10 top-rated broadcast and cable TV shows airing in 2016, one actor (Mitchell of NCIS) has the disability portrayed on screen, a Ruderman Family Foundation study found.
In 21 series on streaming platforms, two actors out of the 17 playing characters with disabilities had a real-life disability.
Hollywood isn’t alone in its employment practices. In 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics found that the unemployment rate for people with disabilities was more than double that of the non-disabled (10.5 per cent vs. 4.6 per cent).
ELUSIVE ROLES
When disabled people are portrayed in films and on TV, roles lean heavily toward conditions that aren’t physically visible. A role involving an apparent disability may go to an actor with the condition — little person Mark Povinelli played a character with dwarfism on Amazon’s Mad Dogs — or not. In Strong, the film about a Boston Marathon bombing survivor left a double amputee, a computeraltered Jake Gyllenhaal played the part.
That leaves performers with disabilities largely out in the cold.
“Disabled people (audition) for roles and characters that are disabled, but they don’t read for able-bodied characters,” even if their disability wouldn’t affect the portrayal or story, said actor Kurt Yaeger (Greg the Peg on Sons of Anarchy). Yaeger, who lost a leg in a motorcycle accident, said his agility with a prosthetic allows him to “hide” it for non-disabled parts and increases his job options.
Scott Silveri, creator and executive producer of ABC’s Speechless, joins in brushing away the tired notion that a story’s dramatic flow or audience would be thrown off by seeing a physically challenged person.
“When you go into a bank and a teller has a limp, do you get confused, walk out into the parking lot and walk around?” he said. “What’s the big deal? Go outside — there are crutches and canes and wheelchairs, and people using them.”
AGENTS OF CHANGE
Silveri is among those trying to make a difference. After working on fluffy hit sitcoms including Friends, the writer-producer decided to peer into his own life and create a series about a youngster with cerebral palsy and his family. (Silveri’s brother, who had the condition, died recently at age 47.)
“I’m proud of our show and proud we shine a light,” he said, crediting a receptive ABC for snapping up Speechless. As for casting an actor with a disability in the role, he never considered otherwise. I want to put out the best show possible, and it just wouldn’t pass the smell test to cast somebody who didn’t have this disability. But the other half is, it’s the right thing to do whenever possible,” he said, “and I’d have to hear the argument why not.”
Budget fears are a poor excuse, says actor Danny Woodburn (Mickey on Seinfeld), who has dwarfism and co-wrote the 2016 Ruderman Foundation report. Hiring an actor with a disability rarely costs an employer more, he said, but when an accommodation such as a ramp is needed the expense is typically less than $500.
PROGRESS, IN INCHES
The movement has got pushback. Some in the industry say insisting on disability-specific casting is an infringement on their freedom to cast the actor they want for artistic or financial reasons, while others label it political correctness run amok.
Director Michael Mailer, son of the late novelist Norman Mailer, defended his casting of Alec Baldwin as a nearly sightless man in Blind, a 2017 indie film.
“In order to green light an independent film, one must attract a ‘name’ actor for a fraction of a studio paycheque if there is to be any chance at getting the film financed,” Mailer wrote in a piece last year for Deadline.
“And while I’m sure there are many talented, vision-impaired actors out there, I do not currently know of any who have the marquee appeal needed to get even a modestly budgeted film made.”
Ruderman, who had criticized the casting, remains unconvinced by such arguments.