Saskatoon StarPhoenix

Liberals give in to interests of corporate world

- GREG FINGAS Greg Fingas is a Regina lawyer, blogger and freelance political commentato­r who has written about provincial and national issues from a progressiv­e NDP perspectiv­e since 2005.

Justin Trudeau’s election as Prime Minister of Canada can largely be chalked up to his campaign promise of massive infrastruc­ture spending — an offer to voters that a Liberal government would do and spend more than other parties to build new public infrastruc­ture.

Of course, Trudeau’s spin was always based on misleading representa­tions of the other parties’ plans, and particular­ly a false attempt to equate deficits with public investment. But his theme promoting the value of large-scale public infrastruc­ture — to be built even if it meant some red ink in the short term — was seen as signalling a government willing to make ambitious decisions in the public interest, and played a crucial role in the Liberals’ election.

Sadly, it didn’t take long for any prospect of visionary federal investment to fall by the wayside.

From Day 1, the Liberals’ proposed pace of increase in infrastruc­ture spending proved unworkable. Instead of meeting his promise to double the amount poured into infrastruc­ture over the first two years of his term, Trudeau merely continued the pace set by the displaced Conservati­ves.

More recently, the Liberals’ policy on infrastruc­ture has taken an even more alarming turn — from failing to seek out opportunit­ies to advance the public interest, to actively promoting corporate opportunit­ies.

Instead of improving the federal government’s capacity to seek out and invest in projects to serve public ends under public ownership, the Liberals have set up an infrastruc­ture bank to fund and promote schemes for investor profit.

And this week’s federal takeover of the Trans Mountain pipeline is the largest step yet in using the public treasury for private gain.

On that front, it’s worth noting that Kinder Morgan positioned itself to flee at a profit if the predictabl­e problems with a Trans Mountain expansion ever materializ­ed. Its financing model always placed substantia­l risk on oil producers and government­s, maximizing the pressure that could be brought to transfer any downside risk.

Unfortunat­ely, Trudeau either failed to recognize that plan, or didn’t see a problem using our money to bring it to fruition. Hence the federal government’s willingnes­s to pour $4.5 billion into purchasing an existing pipeline recently valued at barely a tenth of that amount, and then to commit to the future cost of pursuing any expansion — all resulting entirely from its panicked reaction to an artificial deadline imposed by a shrewd corporate operator.

What’s worse, even if one overlooks how Trudeau allowed Kinder Morgan to play his government like a fiddle, the broader implicatio­ns of a publicly funded pipeline expansion also involve a disturbing willingnes­s to use public money solely for the purpose of inflating private profits.

The fossil fuel sector as a whole — including the Alberta oilsands — has seen royalty rates plunge in recent years. And with the U.S. pushing its own production of oil products to unpreceden­ted levels, there’s little prospect that royalty revenues will ever return to the inflated levels that once insulated a few provinces from any perceived responsibi­lity to manage their economies with an eye to the future.

The ultimate effect of the Trans Mountain bailout is thus a massive immediate windfall for Kinder Morgan, which at best might result in oil producers seeing their profits soar as well while providing minimal return to the public.

Even leaving aside the catastroph­ic environmen­tal ramificati­ons of pipeline expansion, the Liberals’ willingnes­s to pour tens of billions of dollars of public money into that result surely signals their complete capture by corporate interests. And voters who recognized the value of a promise of public investment to serve the common good will need to look elsewhere.

...The Liberals’ proposed pace of increase in infrastruc­ture spending proved unworkable.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada