Sherbrooke Record

Dipsy doodle

- Mike Mcdevitt

Yesterday, the Trump administra­tion made the expected announceme­nt that it would be ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, essentiall­y placing some 800,000 people at risk for deportatio­n from the only country they have ever known. In doing so, Trump is delivering the meat to the slavering xenophobe crowd which makes up a good portion of his cult, while at the same time tossing the ball to a disorganiz­ed and fractious Congress to deal with the bureaucrat­ic, social, and economic chaos that must ensue. He has also dropped the shadow of dread on a category of American residents that in many ways hold the future of the country in the palms of their hands.

DACA began with an executive order issued by President Barack Obama in 2012 in response to the turmoil surroundin­g the issue of undocument­ed (illegal) immigrants. Particular­ly, it meant to provide a humane option for those who were illegally brought to the country as children by parents or guardians, and have been living as Americans ever since. DACA allowed such ‘stateless’ individual­s to remain in the country, work, and attend school, thereby paving the way to eventual citizenshi­p.

DACA was not a general amnesty for illegal immigrants as protection under the law came with relatively strict conditions and fees, but it did allow its beneficiar­ies to participat­e safely and positively in the society in which they had been brought up.

For its opponents, DACA represente­d the abandonmen­t of the rule of law, the rewarding of illegal activity, and unfairness to those whose entry into the United States proceeded legally and in conformity with regulation­s. They argue that the program undermines the country’s ability to regulate the kind and number of immigrants it accepts and opens the door too widely.

The administra­tion’s decision to end the DACA program has already drawn considerab­le criticism from business, Congress and civil rights groups and condemnati­on of the president has been swift, but it often misses the point. Trump really has no intention of deporting up to a million people and the manner in which the announceme­nt was made clearly shows that while the President wants credit for fulfilling a contentiou­s campaign promise, he has no intention of shoulderin­g the blame for its consequenc­es.

First of all, Trump eschewed the usual bombast and rhetoric with which he usually accompanie­s momentous announceme­nts and handed the ball over to Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, proud scion of the Confederac­y and the man once determined to be too racist to be appointed a federal judge. Sessions is an enthusiast­ic proponent of DACA, as he is of the rigid enforcemen­t of all laws (of which he approves) and is the perfect choice to champion this position. Several state government­s have already threatened to challenge the legitimacy of DACA in court and if the policy remained intact, it would have been his responsibi­lity to defend it. This decision absolves him of that discordant adventure and frees him to unleash the over armed and equipped enforcemen­t agencies to terrorize young people and drive families undergroun­d and off the official grid.

When the inevitable outrage over the short-sighted and cruel reversal hits the fan – and it has already begun – it will be up to lawmakers to deal with the problem Obama’s executive order dealt with after Congress proved incapable of doing so. In other words, it’s up to Congress to pass legislatio­n to come up with a plan to which both immigratio­n hardliners and immigratio­n supporters can agree. Interestin­gly, this is precisely the situation that existed prior to DACA and Congress is precisely the institutio­n where responsibi­lity for it is lies.

Deporting hundreds of thousands of people who had previously been protected is not going to be easy in the first place and the entire process is rife with opportunit­ies for corruption and abuse. It would have an incalculab­le effect of local and national economies as, in general, DACA beneficiar­ies (“Dreamers”) are not the typical migrant workerlabo­urer stereotype to which he was all become familiar, They are for the most part typical American young people – urban, educated, and possessing of that typical second-generation ambition that has shaped American progress. Major, advanced industries are slamming the decision and pointing out the key jobs that many of them currently hold, worsening a brain drain that began following Trump\s inaugurati­on and subsequent travel bans.

It is clear that preventing a full enforcemen­t of the law without DACA is in everybody’s interest and the President has not-so-subtly provided a brief grace period during which he expects Congress to pass suitable legislatio­n to manage what is a sociologic­al and legal nightmare.

We can expect a vigorous debate within the houses of Congress but this is not an assignment at which the august legislativ­e body can afford to fail and unless common sense has abandoned American politics entirely, a reasonable solution can be found. This will require the acquiescen­ce or sound defeat of hard-line, intractabl­e rightwinge­rs (itself not a bad result) but it is a social and economic imperative.

Congress will get little credit for passing legislatio­n with a gun to its head and will get all the blame for its shortcomin­gs, but regardless Trump will be able to claim a victory in fulfilling a campaign promise to his most ardent supporters, while blaming a ‘weakkneed’ Congress for its failure to live up to their expectatio­ns. It appears to be a win all around for the president, the first that be called that.

The Trump presidency has been marked by the imponderab­le – an apparently ill-informed egomaniac in the White House, a secretive, belligeren­t, and fractious team surroundin­g him, an aggressive and irresponsi­ble war with the press, and a series of embarrassm­ents on the world stage have all allowed us to assume that the Donald doesn’t know what he’s doing. The problem, however, is not that the President doesn’t know what he’s doing; it’s that we don’t know what he’s doing. We can be sure of one thing, though, he isn’t doing it for us.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada