The Chronicle Herald (Metro)

‘Toomuch noise’ on warship program: deputy minister

- DAVID PUGLIESE POSTMEDIA NEWS

Defence industry executives have been told by a top bureaucrat to stop raising concerns about the controvers­ial program to build a new fleet of warships that is now estimated to cost $70 billion and could go even higher.

Company officials have been complainin­g to politician­s and media outlets that the Canadian Surface Combatant project has fallen far short on its promises of creating domestic employment.

Another company is in the middle of a lawsuit over the Canadian Surface Combatant or CSC, alleging the procuremen­t was bungled. Federal lawyers are trying to limit the amount of informatio­n that can be disclosed in court about the project, with the next hearing to be held Jan. 13. Other industry executives have been warning politician­s the rising price tag for CSC will jeopardize funding for other equally important military equipment projects.

But Jody Thomas, deputy minister of the Department of National Defence, told executives Oct. 5 that they are hindering the project and she characteri­zed their efforts as being those of sore losers. “I think there's still too much noise from unsuccessf­ul bidders that makes my job and Bill's job very difficult,” she said, referring to Bill Matthews, deputy minister at Public Services and Procuremen­t Canada.

The CSC project would see the constructi­on of 15 warships for the Royal Canadian Navy at Irving Shipbuildi­ng on the east coast. Constructi­on of the vessels, to replace the current Halifax-class frigate fleet, isn't expected to start until 2023. But the project has already faced delays and significan­t increases in cost as the price tag has climbed from an original $14-billion estimate to around $70 billion.

In an email to Postmedia about Thomas's statement to defence executives, the DND noted that industry officials have the right to raise their concerns with politician­s or turn to the courts if needed. “However, the Department of National Defence, including the Deputy Minister, works for Canadians,” the DND stated. “While we maintain close, positive working relationsh­ips with industry, our primary responsibi­lity is to the Canadian taxpayer.”

But Thomas's admonishme­nt didn't surprise industry representa­tives; although they won't go on record with their names for fear of jeopardizi­ng future military contracts, a number of executives point out that for years federal officials have tried to keep a lid on questions and concerns, as well as informatio­n about the CSC.

A review of past actions by the current Liberal and previous Conservati­ve government­s and internal documents obtained by Postmedia through the Access to Informatio­n law appear to support that view.

Federal officials have on two occasions tried to stymie attempts by the Parliament­ary Budget Officer to obtain details and budget outlines of the CSC project, as well as with other vessel constructi­on programs under the government's National Shipbuildi­ng Strategy.

In 2019, officials with Public Services and Procuremen­t Canada issued a directive that firms interested in maintenanc­e work on the Canadian Surface Combatant program could not talk to journalist­s and instead must refer all inquiries to the department. That was the fifth such gag order on military equipment projects issued by government over a year-long period.

In one case, Procuremen­t Canada threatened to punish any firms who violated the gag order on the proposed purchase of a light icebreaker. That prompted one unnamed company to submit a question to the department on whether a government ban on talking to journalist­s was even legal, according to records.

Industry executives pointed out last year the secrecy was not based on security concerns, but on worries the news media would be able to use the informatio­n to keep close tabs on the problempla­gued military procuremen­t system. After Postmedia reported on the gag orders, Procuremen­t Canada claimed last year it would no longer use such bans.

Michael Byers, a professor at the University of British Columbia who has produced two studies on the troubled federal shipbuildi­ng program, said government officials have repeatedly tried to limit the amount of informatio­n available on the CSC and other shipbuildi­ng projects. “These projects are in serious trouble and when you have those problems, combined with politics, the pressure to keep things secret are very, very high,” he explained.

Federal officials appear to be concerned specifical­ly about journalist­s who might be reporting on two particular ship projects; the CSC and the Arctic and Offshore Patrol Ships or AOPS. Both projects involve Irving Shipbuildi­ng.

Documents show Irving representa­tives and bureaucrat­s from Procuremen­t Canada (then called Public Works) warned DND procuremen­t official Ian Mack in April 2013 that CBC journalist Terry Milewski was working on a story about the high costs of the AOPS and the fact that other nations paid a fraction of what Canadian taxpayers were being charged for similar vessels. Six days after Mack sent his warning out to other bureaucrat­s, Milewski produced his report.

In 2016, Public Works officials alerted Minister Judy Foote's office Postmedia was asking questions about the CSC. Foote's office, in turn, warned Irving representa­tives.

In March 2019, the DND and Public Services and Procuremen­t Canada warned Irving Shipbuildi­ng that Postmedia was asking questions about problems with welds on the AOPS. Documents show that after a series of questions were submitted by Postmedia to the DND, PSPC deputy minister Bill Matthews, DND deputy minister Thomas and Pat Finn, then DND'S top procuremen­t official, held a conference call with Irving President Kevin Mccoy.

Mccoy briefed “Jody, Bill, Pat” about the company's plans to sue Postmedia if it “published anything that impugned our profession­al reputation.” There is no indication in the document that the bureaucrat­s raised any objections to the company's strategy. Thomas took no notes during the conference call, according to the department's Access to Informatio­n branch.

Matthews responded to Irving's decision with a supportive email. “Welcome to my world,” Matthews wrote to Mccoy.

 ?? PHOTO SUPPLIED BY IRVING SHIPBUILDI­NG INC. ?? The second keel unit of the first Arctic Offshore Patrol Ship (AOPS) is moved into place at Irving Shipbuildi­ng’s Halifax Shipyard in this 2016 file photo.
PHOTO SUPPLIED BY IRVING SHIPBUILDI­NG INC. The second keel unit of the first Arctic Offshore Patrol Ship (AOPS) is moved into place at Irving Shipbuildi­ng’s Halifax Shipyard in this 2016 file photo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada