The Chronicle Herald (Provincial)

Let public see findings

-

The provincial Liberal government is right. Answers are needed, quickly, about what happened at Northwood this spring that led to 53 deaths there due to COVID-19.

The pandemic’s second wave could hit this fall. Understand­ing and correcting shortcomin­gs that may have contribute­d to the tragic loss of life at the Halifax-based long-term-care facility is crucial and urgent.

Health Minister Randy Delorey and Premier Stephen Mcneil are also right that those involved — including Northwood staff and management, government and Nova Scotia Health Authority officials, family members and others — must feel free to speak openly, without fear of legal repercussi­ons, about what they know.

However, the method announced Tuesday by the government to accomplish the above — a review struck under the Quality-improvemen­t Informatio­n Protection Act — convenient­ly also allows Mcneil’s Liberals to operate as they seem to prefer whenever possible, behind closed doors.

Citing the act’s provisions, specifical­ly the requiremen­t to keep personal health and other informatio­n private, Delorey announced that only the twoperson quality-improvemen­t review panel’s recommenda­tions, expected by Sept. 15, would be made public.

The government cited the need to move quickly as justificat­ion for going this route.

First, it’s questionab­le whether only recommenda­tions from the quality review committee — infectious disease consultant Dr. Chris Lata and former B.C. associate deputy minister of health Lynn Stevenson — could be made public, as government contends.

The legislatio­n, though complicate­d, seems to allow for disclosure of informatio­n apart from recommenda­tions, as long as personal health and other informatio­n is kept confidenti­al. Surely, government has the ability to ensure the committee’s broader findings have identifyin­g personal informatio­n removed before release.

Fifty-three families, as well as many others with loved ones now in nursing homes or anticipati­ng that scenario in future, want to know what happened at Northwood, and why.

To fully understand any recommenda­tions from the quality review committee, the public should also see the informatio­n those recommenda­tions were based on, with, of course, all personal health and other identifyin­g informatio­n removed.

A second review within the Department of Health and Wellness will look at infection prevention and control in all long-term-care facilities.

The government has faced tough questionin­g on why, instead of a quality review, a public inquiry was not called into both Northwood and the larger state of the long-termcare sector.

Public inquiries can also protect those who testify from facing legal consequenc­es for what they say, and — with robust terms of reference calling for a preliminar­y report within a designated time period — findings and recommenda­tions by mid-september would theoretica­lly be possible, as well.

Government spokeswoma­n Heather Fairbairn said Friday that inquiries can “take a long time to initiate and complete, and are designed to meet other objectives than the review announced this week.”

The government, having struck this committee, is unlikely to change course.

But they can do two things. First, revise their plans to make more than just the committee’s recommenda­tions public.

Second, commit to holding — at a later date — a full public inquiry into the state of longterm care in this province.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada