The Daily Courier

Authoritie­s agree too much sugar intake is risky

- KEITH ROACH

DEAR DR. ROACH: There was some controvers­y recently in a medical journal about the risk of sugar intake for heart disease. What is your take?

ANSWER: There was a recent article in the Annals of Internal Medicine that evaluated recommende­d limits on added sugar in food. The guidelines came from the World Health Organizati­on, Public Health England and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Although their guidelines were different, all recommende­d limiting added sugar intake.

The paper, which was funded by a trade group, concluded that the guidelines were based on low-quality evidence and “do not meet criteria for trustworth­y recommenda­tions.” That’s the controvers­y.

I did an extensive search of recent articles on the health effects of high-sugar diets. I found two fairly well-done trials that show a modest increase in risk of chronic diseases (diabetes, heart disease, breast cancer and gallbladde­r disease) in people who have higher-glycemic-index diets.

I also reviewed a companion piece in the Annals, which found evidence that studies supported by manufactur­ers of sugarsweet­ened beverages were much more likely to find that sugar is not a good cause of chronic disease than studies that were independen­tly funded.

This suggests that the sugar industry may be trying, as did the tobacco industry, to discredit work on diet. I must unfortunat­ely conclude that the Annals review paper has a potential for conflicts of interest.

Nearly all authoritie­s agree that excess dietary sugar is a significan­t risk factor, not only for the developmen­t of diabetes, but also for other serious medical conditions. I continue to recommend against excess sugar intake.

However, I can’t say exactly how much is safe, so I think using a guideline, such as the U.S. Health and Human Services recommenda­tion to limit to less than 10 per cent of daily calories, is rational.

DEAR DR. ROACH: It seems a lot of people have high total cholestero­l and take drugs for it.

But what do you think of an elderly person having a total cholestero­l of 138 without taking any drugs? It seems to me this is an unhealthy situation, and somehow this person needs to do something to increase his cholestero­l. How would a person do this? The stats are triglyceri­des 99, HDL 45 and LDL 74.

ANSWER: Unfortunat­ely, I can’t answer the question, because a low cholestero­l level can be either a healthy or an unhealthy finding, depending on the circumstan­ce.

For a healthy, active elderly person of normal weight, the numbers you told me about would represent a low risk of heart disease.

However, low cholestero­l levels, particular­ly in the elderly, often go along with poor nutritiona­l status and chronic disease. It wouldn’t surprise if you told me the person you are referring to has a serious chronic illness (of almost any type).

If the person does have chronic illness, the cholestero­l is a marker for a problem, not a problem in itself. Therefore, the treatment isn’t increasing the cholestero­l (especially with unhealthy foods); rather, the treatment should be directed at the underlying disease.

If a disease is unknown but suspected, then a careful history and physical exam, with a judicious laboratory evaluation, is warranted.

Readers may email questions to ToYourGood­Health@med.cornell.edu.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada