The Daily Courier

Make sure shareholde­rs’ agreements are current

- ANJALI INMAN Anjali Inman is a lawyer at Pihl Law in Kelowna. If you would like more informatio­n on shareholde­rs’ agreement, please contact her at . For more legal news check out Pihl.ca.

Everyone knows accidents happen. That’s why many of us carry insurance on our homes, on our lives and on our businesses. But, if you’re running a small privatelyh­eld company, have you ever considered insuring your relationsh­ip with your shareholde­rs?

Maybe the answer is yes and you’ve wisely had a shareholde­rs’ agreement drafted. Now, ask yourself: When was it written? Maybe 10 years ago? And if so, have you looked at it since? Unlike those annual fee increases insurance companies send out, no one will be pestering you to review your shareholde­r agreement to ensure it still refers to the correct shareholde­rs or reflects the current arrangemen­t with your business partners.

Well, with spring cleaning now here, what better time to pull out that dusty shareholde­r’s agreement?

Like a good insurance policy, a current and comprehens­ive shareholde­rs’ agreement can save you and your family from a lot of uncertaint­y and grief, not only in the event of an untimely accident or death, but also in the event a business partner wants or needs to exit the business.

A shareholde­rs agreement is simply a legal contract between the shareholde­rs and the corporatio­n itself, that, if made unanimousl­y, becomes a fundamenta­l governing document of your corporatio­n.

It works alongside the corporatio­n’s other fundamenta­l document, such as articles of incorporat­ion, but is different in that it is customized to fit the business and the shareholde­rs’ specific interests. The key here is customizat­ion. A simple standard form agreement with boilerplat­e clauses is not likely to provide adequate coverage for your unique personal, family or business needs.

One of the key issues to be addressed by a shareholde­rs’ agreement is the death or disability of a principal shareholde­r.

With respect to the latter, typically, the agreement would define disability.

This is often when a principal is not able to actively engage in the business for a certain period of time.

The agreement would go on to provide for a buy-out of the disabled party’s interest.

Similarly, if a principal shareholde­r suddenly passes away, a well-drafted agreement would contain a buy-out provision that would allow the other shareholde­rs to either buy-out the deceased’s interest or cause the corporatio­n to buy-out the deceased’s interest in a manner that does not put the other shareholde­r(s) in financial distress and permits sufficient cash flow in the business to allow for continued operations.

These provisions will contain a valuation formula or method, either based on financial statements or on the opinion of a qualified business valuator, and should address both how the buy-out will be funded and a payment schedule for such funding.

When it comes to drafting the buy-out, a good legal advisor will speak to you about insurance.

Often, in the event of an untimely accident or death of a shareholde­r, the remaining shareholde­rs aren’t in a position to personally fund a buy-out. Proper life insurance coverage can assist. Partners can hold life insurance on each other, with the agreement providing should one partner pass away or become disabled, the other collects the proceeds and uses them to fund the buy-out, known as the criss-cross method.

Or, the corporatio­n can be both the owner and beneficiar­y of the life insurance, which would allow the corporatio­n to buy-back and cancel the deceased’s shares by way of share redemption.

The share redemption and the criss-cross method have different tax treatments.

one results in a capital gain and the other in a deemed dividend and, as a result, specific tax advice will be required.

It’s also worth noting life insurance coverage wouldn’t be available to fund a buy-out that arises due to the disability of a shareholde­r.

In this case, disability or critical illness insurance would be needed to fund the buy-out arrangemen­t.

Finally, no matter what type of insurance policy shareholde­rs may be relying upon to help fund a buy-out, insurance values should be reviewed regularly to ensure they provide adequate coverage for what is, hopefully, an increasing buy-out value.

The death and disability provisions should also elicit discussion between shareholde­rs.

Some clients want the protection of knowing, in the event of their death, their families will be bought out, but some clients want to be able to pass on their equity to their families.

There’s no one-size-fits-all and each shareholde­r to the agreement may be coming from a different family life cycle stage and financial background.

Additional­ly, given that financial and family situations are subject to continual change, it’s a good idea to periodical­ly review your shareholde­rs’ agreements to ensure the drafting adequately captures those significan­t life changes.

Shareholde­rs’ agreements also should address the possibilit­y a shareholde­r needs or wants to leave the corporatio­n.

Life is unpredicta­ble and more often than not, even in the face of a good relationsh­ip between shareholde­rs, when one shareholde­r decides to leave, the decision is not met with pure well-wishes from the remaining shareholde­rs.

Shareholde­rs’ agreements address this with clauses known as shotgun clauses and put options that structure what is essentiall­y a business divorce between shareholde­rs and can help avoid unpleasant, not to mention, costly, litigation.

Shareholde­rs’ agreements also address a wide variety of other issues, including: appointmen­ts to the board of directors, officer appointmen­ts, dispute resolution, controls on share transfers (to protect against unwelcome shareholde­rs), future share issuances (to protect against dilution), capital contributi­ons of shareholde­rs, rights of first refusal, rights on divorce of a shareholde­r, non-solicitati­on and non-competitio­n clauses.

Although a shareholde­rs’ agreement cannot contemplat­e every possible scenario, one of the best reasons to put a shareholde­rs’ agreement in place is that it forces the parties to discuss the issues which could arise prior to them facing those issues.

Once the agreement is in place, then the parties can carry on with the peace of mind that any insurance brings.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada