The Daily Courier

It’s not tax reform, it’s a tax increase

- DAN ALBAS

I am going to begin this week by crediting a few backbench members of the Liberal caucus in Ottawa. A few of these MP’s have been quietly voicing displeasur­e with the Liberals attempts to frame a proposed tax increase on small business owners and other profession­als such as doctors, as being all about tax fairness when in reality it is simply a tax increase.

These Liberal MP’s have no doubt received the same types of emails that I have been getting from accountant­s, who consistent­ly provide data that the prime minister’s claims on taxes paid by small business owners and others are patently false. So what is really going on here? Earlier this week, the Department of Finance revealed that the actual deficit from the 2016-17 fiscal periods was just under $18 billion. The good news for the Liberal government is the forecasted deficit was $23 billion. The bad news for the prime minister is that he promised a deficit of $10 billion and has still has not announced when or how we will return to a balanced budget.

Fair to say, it will not be in the year 2019 as was also promised by the Liberals.

Looking closer at the deficit of roughly $18 billion, two items stand out.

First, $3.7 billion in budgeted spending did not yet make it out of Ottawa. There are many reasons for this and it is not uncommon for any federal government to see delays in spending commitment­s.

The other interestin­g aspect of this budget deficit was that the forecasted income tax revenues actually dropped by just over $1 billion. As you may recall, the prime minister increased income tax rates on those who earn in excess of $200,000 and they now pay a personal income tax rate of 33 per cent. As a result of this tax increase the Liberals had predicted income tax revenue would increase by close to $3 billion.

So, the Liberals need to increase revenue to pay for their increased spending, and seeing as it has not been realized by income tax increases, the intent now is to go after those who are personally incorporat­ed.

The challenge is the truly wealthy, those who can take stock options at a 50 per cent reduced tax rate, are not being targeted by these proposed tax fairness changes.

Instead, small business owners, the majority of which are not among the one per cent of Canada’s most wealthy, are being targeted along with some upper middle income profession­als such as doctors.

Farmers, fisherman and other groups also are being targeted and impacted by these tax proposals.

The Liberals continue to insist the tax fairness changes will not hurt small business owners and other profession­al groups in the usual “Ottawa knows best” tone. Here is the problem. Ottawa bureaucrat­s, majority of† whom have never owned or run a business, when attempting to tell small business owners how an Ottawa imposed tax increase will impact them, tend to offend.

I know this because I hear from many of these offended entreprene­urs, every day.

Worse is the Liberals have yet to explain how Ottawa bureaucrat­s will make arbitrary decisions on how family members of a small business may or may not be able to be paid.

Does a stay-at-home parent raising children and doing the books of a small business qualify to be paid? We don’t know. How many more Ottawa bureaucrat­s will need to be hired to administer these complex changes and at what cost? Again, the Liberals will not say. Ultimately this issue is not about tax fairness, it is all about a tax increase and I congratula­te those Liberal MP’s who are admitting as much.

What is your opinion? Do you view these tax changes as tax fairness or a tax increase?

Dan Albas is the Conservati­ve member of Parliament for Central OkanaganSi­milkameen-Nicola. Contact him at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or call 1-800-665-8711.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada