Tax fairness doesn’t apply to PM or finance minister
Although the subject of the Liberal government’s contemplated “tax fairness” measures continues to dominate much of the discussion I am hearing both here in the riding and in Ottawa, it is important to not overlook the previous Conservative government’s “fairness” debate during the last Parliament.
Many may forget however, formerly both the federal public sector pension plans as well as the MP pension plan contributions were heavily subsidized by taxpayers.
In a measure of pension plan fairness to taxpayers, former prime minister Stephen Harper made changes so that contributions to these respective pension plans would eventually become equally split at 50/50 between employees and the employer.
Those changes were estimated to save taxpayers $2.6 billion over a five-year period and are now fully in effect for 2017.
One aspect of these changes was not widely reported. The former prime minister also removed a special pension clause reserved exclusively for prime ministers. Removing this clause alone cost Harper in excess of $1 million in future pension benefits that his predecessors still receive.
I mention this for the fact that it was revealed this week in the House of Commons that the Liberal tax changes, if implemented, will not adversely impact the personal family fortunes of either Prime Minister Justin Trudeau or Finance Minister Bill Morneau.
This revelation has created a significant amount of controversy, for good reason.
When millionaire families, being the real one percent of wealth, are not being impacted by “tax fairness” at the expense of small business owners, farmers, ranchers and other professionals, is that really fair?
Many small business owners and others I am hearing from strongly disagree. Ironically, I am also hearing from a growing number of Liberal MPs in Ottawa who are also voicing concerns on the long-term consequences this tax increase may create.
Dan Albas is the Conservative member of Parliament for Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola.