Rural B.C. will be represented

Dear Editor: Re: “No to proportional representation,” editorial by James Miller (Courier, Dec. 5).

Seriously? Mr. Miller thinks that average Canadians can’t understand voting systems that are used in most of the developed world? (Canada, Great Britain and the U.S. being the notable exceptions). If we cannot figure out how to put more than one ‘X’ on a ballot, then we are truly in trouble — no matter what voting system we use.

Does Mr. Miller really think that “more collaboration and consultation and ... a louder voice to the majority of the people.” would be a bad thing?

And then there’s the big lie — the one some think they can just repeat and repeat and people will believe it. In short, rural and “other unique areas” will not lose representation. All areas will be represented more accurately, so that what is unique about a rural NDP voice will be represented and what is unique about an urban Liberal voice will be represented (housing affordability comes to mind).

As for so called fringe parties, I would rather have them in the legislature where there is the possibility of addressing their concerns than in having them take over a major party — as has happened in the U.S.. Bet Cecill

Gibsons count toward representation, majority governments consisting of a single party with 100 per cent of the power are often formed with the support of only 40 per cent of the electorate. Fifteen of 17 governments in B.C. since 1956 have been false majorities.

We need a modern, proportional voting system that will respect voter intention, make every vote count, deliver fair results, and help us elect a legislature that reflects the preferences of all British Columbians. Jim Galer

Kelowna