The Daily Courier

Bone density drug seems to keep working after you stop taking it

- Readers may email questions to ToYourGood­Health@med.cornell.edu KEITH ROACH

DEAR DR. ROACH: I have read in your previous columns that you have been cautionary about taking medication­s like Fosamax. I hope you can help me with my situation. I am 76 years old. I took Fosamax for 13 years, stopping in 2010. My last scan showed a T-score of -2.4 in the spine and -2.1 in the hip, which was a little worse than last time.

Does Fosamax stay in the system and continue to work? If so, for how long? You previously have recommende­d re-evaluation after five years; does that mean not to go on it again in the future? What are some alternativ­es?

ANSWER: Thirteen years is a long time to continue taking a bisphospho­nate drug, such as alendronat­e (Fosamax) or risedronat­e (Actonel). There are not good studies to show effectiven­ess beyond 10 years.

There does seem to be some residual effect on bone density after stopping: Bone density remained higher and fracture risk lower, correspond­ing with data showing that the medication remains in the bone for years (and possibly decades) after stopping it.

If your bone density is getting worse, it is reasonable to consider restarting treatment. I don’t have enough informatio­n to make a recommenda­tion to you; other items that should be considered include your risk for fracture (FRAX score), the rate of decline (if any) of the bone density and evaluation of other risk factors, especially vitamin D, diet and exercise.

Some authoritie­s recommend restarting bisphospho­nates like Fosamax if the bone density goes down and fracture risk is high after stopping it; however, I certainly would consider other options, including the parathyroi­d like hormone teriparati­de, or raloxifene (an estrogenli­ke drug). Denosumab would not be my first choice, as it acts the same way as bisphospho­nates, preventing reabsorpti­on of bone, which potentiall­y can lead to atypical femur fractures from frozen bone.

DEAR DR. ROACH: Our son, who is in his 40s, had always been a happy person until he was diagnosed with clinical depression. He has been to psychiatri­sts and psychologi­sts, and has been prescribed medication­s. He said the side effects of the medication were worse than what he was going through, so he and his wife agreed that he’d stop taking them. It has been a year since we have seen him, as it is too emotional for him to meet with us. We miss our son, and any help would be appreciate­d.

ANSWER: Major depression is a serious illness, but there are treatments. It is certainly true medication treatment for depression may have side effects, and it also is true that there are people for whom finding an effective medication treatment is difficult.

However, there are many different kinds of treatment: several classes of pharmacolo­gical therapy (some, such as gabapentin, not normally used for depression), but also nondrug treatments, including psychother­apy, transcrani­al magnetic stimulatio­n and electrocon­vulsive therapy (which sounds horrible, but is a surprising­ly well-tolerated treatment that deserves considerat­ion in severe depression that’s resistant to other treatments).

I would encourage your son to seek another opinion, from a person willing to look beyond standard therapy. I have had success with a folic acidlike supplement called S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe), for example. This can be used in combinatio­n with standard treatments.

DEAR DR. ROACH: I read your article on various types of flu vaccines. I really need your opinion on whether I should get one of the vaccines. I am a 79-year-old woman in good health and not allergic to eggs.

I know the flu virus is dead and you can’t get the flu from a shot. But when it first became available in the 1950s, I had it in two doses and became very sick for about two weeks with flulike symptoms. So, I avoided it, and throughout the years, I had the flu a few times — once, when I was in my 20s, very bad with type A, and it attacked my nervous system. I was not able to drive for three months. I also got sick after a flu shot in the 1980s.

I am hounded to get the flu vaccine. Now that there are various kinds available, I wonder if I should.

ANSWER: I normally would recommend a high-dose version for a woman in her late 70s, but you clearly have a robust immune system and I suspect that is why you have had a strong reaction.

However, vaccine technology has dramatical­ly improved, and I would recommend a standard-dose flu shot. You also might take a Tylenol right after having the vaccine.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada