MP questions PM’s ‘secret meeting’

Joshua Boyle, the Afghanistan hostage now facing a host of domestic assault charges, met with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shortly after returning to Canada — MP Dan Albas thinks that smells funny

It is unusual to have Ottawa related political news occurring this time of year.

However, recently the unusual in politics has become the usual.

In late December, media were made aware of what they described as a “secret meeting” that occurred between Prime Minister Trudeau and Joshua Boyle.

Boyle was recently freed after being held in captivity in Afghanistan for the previous Àve years.

Why media were suspicious of this particular meeting was due to the fact that the meeting, and the reasons for it, were not publicly disclosed by the Prime Minister’s OfÀce (PMO).

Journalists only discovered this meeting had occurred when members of the Boyle family circulated pictures on social media.

This week, Ottawa police announced that Boyle was being charged with 15 offences from alleged actions that include assault, sexual assault, unlawful conÀnement, uttering threats, public mischief and administering a noxious thing.

These alleged offences are related to the period of time since Boyle returned to Canada in October.

As a result of this situation, there are serious questions being asked about why the prime minister requested a meeting with Boyle.

By extension, questions have been raised on security protocols that should protect the prime minister.

The judgment of the advisers who represent Trudeau in allowing this meeting to go forward also come into focus.

The judgment of the advisers working in the PMO was also raised when the prime minister was recently found guilty of four counts of ethics violations.

These violations were related to free luxury vacations the Justin Trudeau accepted from a registered lobbyist who receives millions in Government of Canada funding.

The judgment of advisers and political staff is a subject that is seldom raised outside of Ottawa.

For obvious reasons, it is being questioned currently.

I have also had some questions on this topic and I can report that the most recently audited expenses for what is called the “Trudeau PMO” were $8.3 million in the 2016-17 Àscal period.

As a comparison, this Àgure is higher than during any year in the previous prime minister’s last term in ofÀce.

All elected ofÀcials have staff and in the case of politically appointed staff, they typically only work in their capacity until the writ period, when the election is called. At that point, the vast majority will become unemployed.

Rehiring depends on who is re-elected and if employment is again offered.

In the case of the prime minister, some are suggesting a staff shakeup is required. Others see this as unfairly throwing the staff under the bus.

Most agree answers are needed on why Trudeau met with Boyle and why this meeting was kept conÀdential.

My question this week ñ Do you believe Canadians deserve an answer to why this meeting was held between Trudeau and Boyle?