The Daily Courier

U.S. shutdown looming, again

Senate celebrates budget deal, but shutdown still possible

- By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Senate leaders brokered a long-elusive budget agreement Wednesday that would shower the Pentagon and domestic programs with an extra $300 billion over the next two years.

But both Democratic liberals and GOP tea party forces swung against the plan, raising questions about its chances just a day before the latest government shutdown deadline.

The measure was a win for Republican allies of the Pentagon and for Democrats seeking more for infrastruc­ture projects and combatting opioid abuse. But it represente­d a bitter defeat for many liberal Democrats who sought to use the party’s leverage on the budget to resolve the plight of immigrant Dreamers who face deportatio­n after being brought to the U.S. illegally as children. The deal does not address immigratio­n.

Senate leaders hope to approve the measure Thursday and send it to the House for a confirming vote before the government begins to shut down tonight at midnight. But hurdles remain.

While Senate Democrats celebrated the moment of rare bipartisan­ship — Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called it a ”genuine breakthrou­gh” — progressiv­es and activists blasted them for leaving immigrants in legislativ­e limbo.

Top House Democrat Nancy Pelosi of California, herself a key architect of the budget plan, announced her opposition Wednesday morning and mounted a remarkable day-long filibuster on the House floor, trying to force GOP leaders in the House to promise a later vote on legislatio­n to protect the younger immigrants.

“Let Congress work its will,” Pelosi said, before holding the floor for more than six hours. “What are you afraid of?”

The White House backed the deal — despite President Donald Trump’s outburst a day earlier that he’d welcome a government shutdown if Democrats didn’t accept his immigratio­n-limiting proposals.

White House spokeswoma­n Sarah Huckabee Sanders sidesteppe­d questions Wednesday about Trump’s turnabout.

“This bill achieves our top priority, a much needed increase in funding for our national defence,” she said. “The bottom line is that thanks to President Trump we can now have the strongest military we have ever had.”

The agreement faced criticism from the other end of the ideologica­l spectrum, as well. Some tea party Republican­s shredded the measure as a budget-buster. Combined with the party’s December tax cut bill, the burst in military and other spending would put the GOP-controlled government on track for the first $1 trillion-plus deficits since President Barack Obama’s first term.

That’s when Congress passed massive stimulus legislatio­n to try to stabilize a down-spiraling economy.

“It’s too much,” said Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., a fiscal hawk.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., however, backed the agreement and was hoping to cobble together a coalition of moderate Democrats and Republican­s to push it through.

Despite the 77-year-old Pelosi’s public talkathon, she was not pressuring the party’s rankand-file to oppose the measure, Democrats said. The deal contains far more money demanded by Democrats than had seemed possible only weeks ago, including $90 billion in disaster aid for Florida and Texas.

Some other veteran Democrats — some of whom said holding the budget deal hostage to action on Dreamer immigrants had already proven to be a failed strategy — appeared more likely to support the agreement than junior progressiv­es elected in recent years.

 ?? The Associated Press ?? With a sign hanging above that says DACA Si, Trump No Capitol Police hold their posts as people participat­e in civil disobedien­ce in support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, in the Russell Rotunda, Wednesday.
The Associated Press With a sign hanging above that says DACA Si, Trump No Capitol Police hold their posts as people participat­e in civil disobedien­ce in support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, in the Russell Rotunda, Wednesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada