The Daily Courier

Infrastruc­ture spending woes reveal another broken promise by Liberals

-

Government­s seldom take flak for not spending enough money. But when it comes to the federal Liberals’ slow-moving infrastruc­ture program, harsh words on this account are warranted.

Despite being elected to fire up the economy with billions of new dollars for public transit, roads, housing and other worthy projects, the government is bungling the job of getting the cash out the door and the necessary work started. How bad is the foul-up?

Parliament­ary Budget Officer Jean-Denis Frechette reports that half of the $14.4 billion set aside for Phase 1 of the New Infrastruc­ture Plan -- $7.2 billion -- has not yet been attributed to any project.

And with all that money sitting idle, the good things it was supposed to build and the jobs it was supposed to create have not materializ­ed.

This embarrassi­ng failure to deliver not only cash but action matters.

First, the aggressive, costly infrastruc­ture spending plan was one of the most important planks in the Liberals’ 2015 election platform.

Remember how their emphasis on infrastruc­ture spending set them apart from their Conservati­ve and NDP opponents? It was supposed to be the high-octane fuel that would rev up Canada’s sputtering economy while making life better for us all.

And the benefits the new spending was supposed to bring would more than justify the Liberals’ plan to run modest deficits of $10 billion a year during their first two years in office.

This bold promise helped elect the Liberals. Today, it stands as another broken Liberal vow.

Indeed, not only is the infrastruc­ture money not being spent, the Liberal deficits are far greater than Canadians were told they would be.

It doesn’t take a cynic to think the highlytout­ed infrastruc­ture pledge was a fig leaf to hide plans for more cash for pet Liberal projects.

Second, the government’s inability to get vital infrastruc­ture projects going in a timely fashion has seriously weakened the impact of the entire program.

The plan depended on a speedy payout of funding for fast results. Yet the actual economic stimulus created by the Liberals’ infrastruc­ture program is only a quarter of what they so confidentl­y predicted. The anticipate­d growth in new jobs was stunted, too.

Third, the Liberals come off looking like exceptiona­lly bad managers. This episode should remind taxpayers that talk is cheap and easy. It’s the delivery that’s hard but matters most. The Liberals haven’t delivered. Meanwhile, the government’s excuses are as feeble as they are unconvinci­ng.

Infrastruc­ture Minister Amarjeet Sohi says the problem is the government didn’t send the Parliament­ary Budget Officer all the informatio­n he needed.

And while being apologetic for that, Sohi insists the government’s record on infrastruc­ture is better than what the budget watchdog’s report concluded.

Sorry, Minister Sohi. Frechette’s report says otherwise.

It explains that the 10,052 projects it identified make up a "substantia­l majority" of the total number the government has planned so far. This should make Canadians more confident of the Parliament­ary Budget Officer’s findings than the infrastruc­ture minister’s self-serving defence.

What Sohi is really saying is he doesn’t know exactly how much has been spent or on what. And that only makes the government look even more careless and inept.

In future, Canadians should beware of campaignin­g Liberals bearing gifts. Especially if they contain infrastruc­ture.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada