The Daily Courier

Union negotiatio­ns critical to B.C. operating balance

- By CHARLES LAMMAM, MILAGROS PALACIOS & HUGH MACINTYRE

During last year’s election campaign and in his first full budget as premier, John Horgan promised to balance British Columbia’s operating budget. If his NDP government remains committed to this promise, the coming negotiatio­ns on compensati­on with 183 public-sector unions will be critically important.

After all, at $29.1 billion, government­employee compensati­on constitute­s more than half of all provincial spending. Managing this area of spending is critical.

Thus far, the government has reached tentative agreements with a few public-sector unions. Details of these early agreements are not yet available but will set the tone for future negotiatio­ns.

Restraint is both needed and warranted, given that research consistent­ly shows the wages and benefits of government employees tend to eclipse those of comparable privatesec­tor workers.

A recent Fraser Institute study provides the latest estimates of the government wage premium in B.C. using Statistics Canada data. The study finds that government employees (federal, provincial and local) receive, on average, 7.4 per cent higher wages than comparable workers in the private sector in the province.

This wage premium accounts for difference­s between workers in the two sectors, such as age, gender, education, tenure, experience and type of work.

But wages are just one component of total compensati­on, which includes pensions, early retirement and job security. As any business owner or manager knows, it’s the total cost of compensati­on that matters, not the individual components.

Yet, even on various nonwage benefits, the data from Statistics Canada suggest that government employees in B.C. come out ahead.

First, consider the imbalance on pensions, one of the costliest benefits provided to workers in both sectors. In 2015, 87.9 per cent of government workers in B.C. were covered by a defined benefit-pension plan (which guarantees a level of benefits in retirement), compared with just 8.7 per cent of workers in the private sector.

Government-sector workers in B.C. also retire 2 1/2 years earlier, on average, than private-sector workers. And they are away from their jobs for personal reasons 55 per cent more days per year (12.4 days versus eight days in the private sector).

When it comes to job security, another nonwage benefit, government workers have a distinct advantage. In 2015, 3.0 per cent of private-sector employment in B.C. experience­d job loss — almost eight times higher than the 0.4 per cent of government-sector employment. Of course, government­s need to provide competitiv­e compensati­on to attract qualified employees, but wages and benefits in the government sector are out of step with the private sector. So what drives this disparity? In the government sector, political factors largely determine the wage-setting process. Economic realities — such as productivi­ty concerns, profitabil­ity and resource constraint­s — guide the process in the private sector.

And the monopoly environmen­t of the government sector amplifies these difference­s compared to the competitiv­e environmen­t of the private sector. Bringing government-employee compensati­on more in line with private-sector norms is one way the provincial government could save money and ensure equity for taxpayers who ultimately foot the bill.

Charles Lammam, Milagros Palacios and Hugh MacIntyre are policy analysts at the Fraser Institute.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada