The Daily Courier

Be proactive on forest fires

-

Dear Editor: The people living in the interior of B.C., particular­ly those living in the Okanagan must become more engaged, and proactive in understand­ing the health consequenc­es, which result when government decisions are made to, either fight a new fire, or let a forest fire burn without any human interventi­on to stop same.

The most recent case in point would be the Harris Creek fire east of Lumby, which is burning and churning out much smoke and ash. The initial press reports were that this fire was not deemed to be a threat to any buildings and property, and as such would be left to burn. The added caveat was that this might be considered a good thing, as accumulate­d forest debris would be cleared out and be less of a danger in the future.

The stated criteria to fight or not fight this new fire, was clearly the immediate danger to property, or humans living in the immediate vicinity.

What calculatio­ns are made to assess the potential air quality issues which might arise, from not deciding to jump on this fire? Who decides what amount of harmful smoke is OK for the Okanagan residents to breathe?

The air quality health index is a means to express the amount of fine particulat­e matter which is in the smoke we are having to breathe. As I look out my window this afternoon of Aug. 10, there is a really cause for concern. The fact that my lungs are being significan­tly compromise­d because, last week, there were no barns or houses in immediate danger, begs a review of our current strategy and criteria to fight fires. The long-term health effects of smoke and ash in my lungs are as important as any building or structure.

Short-term and long-term effects from this horrific amount of smoke and fine particulat­e matter, are significan­t and have been well documented.

Citizens must become aware and engaged. Are sufficient tax dollars being prioritize­d to hire firefighte­rs? Should we have more water bomber/tanker aircraft?

Call your local MLA, write the ministers of forestry and environmen­t, and express your concern.

Be proactive, do this now; don’t endure more years of this real and present health danger, to find you have permanent lung damage because someone else made the decision as to how much smoke you should tolerate. Wayne Laurie Lumby

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada