Why request prorogation?
If you have been following Ottawa-based politics recently, you may have heard some speculation that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau might prorogue the House of Commons, as the fall session is soon set to return.
This begs the more obvious question – what does that mean?
As I have written previously on this topic, prorogation is one of the more interesting Parliamentary procedures. In essence each “session” of Parliament is not unlike a chapter in a book.
As much as each chapter will have a beginning and an end, so too will a session of Parliament.
Prorogation is officially defined as the ending of a session of Parliament.
In this case the first session of this Parliament (the 42nd), would come to a close if it is officially prorogued by a proclamation of the Governor General at the request of the prime minister. Why request prorogation? There can be a number of different reasons, however, the most common is that the next session of Parliament would open with a throne speech. Many consider this akin to hitting the reset button as it allows the sitting government to outline a new or different direction.
Considering the next federal election is fast approaching, many believe there is political value in outlining a new agenda, hence the speculation that the House may be prorogued in the near future.
Is it unusual for the house to be prorogued? Looking back at previous Parliaments, including the last one, there have been only five Parliaments that did not have two or more sessions. In fact, many Parliaments had three or more sessions with some having as many as five, six and even seven sessions within the duration of an elected Parliament.
Part of the reason for this is that prior to having a fixed calendar, prorogation was the only way the House could adjourn for a period of time.
One other interesting aspect of prorogation is that it can be used at the discretion of government without the consent of the opposition (that would normally be required to adjourn the House).
Because prorogation is a tool of government that does not require the consent of the opposition, it tends to be quite heavily opposed when it is used because it allows the government to defer debate or change the channel onto a different subject.
I do not often engage in speculation, however, I believe this session of the House will likely end up being prorogued.
Dan Albas is member of Parliament for Central Okanagan Similkameen Nicola. To contact the writer: Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or call toll free 1-800-665-8711.