The Daily Courier

Will new air travel regulation­s make a difference?

- DAN ALBAS Dan Albas is the Member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan Similkamee­n Nicola and member of the Conservati­ve caucus. His riding includes Kelowna (specific boundaries), West Kelowna, Peachland, Summerland, Keremeos, Princeton, Merri

Earlier this week the federal government announced the most recent update on the proposed air passenger protection regulation­s. Although this current proposal may undergo further consultati­on and is subject to change, it appears close to being finalized for adoption. So what is being proposed? There are a number of measures on a variety of different topics that I will highlight here.

Please note the length of my report does not allow for a full summary.

Delay and cancellati­ons: Depending on whether the reason for a delay or cancellati­on is within airline control, and is not related to safety, passengers may be eligible for financial compensati­on. The amount of compensati­on varies due to the length of the delay and also if the delay occurs on a “large” or “small“airline. A delay between 3-6 hours can result in $125 on small airline per traveller or $400 on a large airline. Denied boarding:

If a passenger is denied boarding for a reason that is within control of the airline and not safety related, for example from overbookin­g, a passenger can receive compensati­on of $900 for up to six hours of delay, $1,800 for six to nine hours of delay and $2,400 for a delay which exceeds nine hours.

Tarmac delays:

Although there is no proposed compensati­on for a tarmac delay, a three-hour maximum time limit is proposed unless takeoff is believed to be imminent.

Seating of children:

Depending upon the age of the child, airlines will not be able to charge for specific seating and must seat a child within certain defined proximitie­s of the parent or guardian travelling with the child.

Loss of luggage: Although it is seldom referenced, there are already legal obligation­s to compensate passengers for lost luggage under the Montreal Convention agreement.

As our current laws stand, up to $2,100 is available as compensati­on on internatio­nal flights. It is proposed that this same level of protection will now apply to domestic flights within Canada.

This final point is what critics of the Passenger Bill of rights frequently point out.

For decades, Canada has had many aviationre­lated laws that benefit passengers. These laws have largely been ignored or not followed properly by airlines.

Critics also cite a lack of enforcemen­t for these violations by the Canadian Transporta­tion Agency.

Recently, CBC has broadcaste­d stories on air travellers who have been mistreated by airlines that share this criticism.

From my perspectiv­e, it is understand­able that some would have concerns that the Bill of Rights does not go far enough or that it undermines current passenger rights that have largely been ignored and not enforced.

There are also concerns that passengers travelling on smaller airlines are getting short changed with less compensati­on available if an infraction occurs.

However, this new proposal does include penalties to airlines of up to $25,000 per incident for non-compliance.

There is clearly a fair bit of discretion that will be required to determine infraction­s and setting actual penalty amounts but the intent for compliance, in my view, is clear.

The bigger question is will more resources be made available to actually investigat­e and enforce these incidents or will passengers be left on their own to settle disputes at the discretion of the airlines?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada