The Daily Courier

Death toll, questions mounting in India

World’s 2nd-largest nation likely to surpass highest fatality count

- By ANIRUDDHA GHOSAL and SHEIKH SAALIQ

NEW DELHI — When Narayan Mitra died on July 16, a day after being admitted to the hospital for fever and breathing difficulti­es, his name never appeared on any of the official lists put out daily of those killed by the coronaviru­s.

Test results later revealed that Mitra had indeed been infected with COVID19, as had his son, Abhijit, and four other family members in Silchar, in northeaste­rn Assam state, on India’s border with Bangladesh.

But Narayan Mitra still isn’t counted as a coronaviru­s victim. The virus was deemed an “incidental” factor, and a panel of doctors decided his death was due to a previously diagnosed neurologic­al disorder that causes muscle weakness.

“He died because of the virus, and there is no point lying about it,” Abhijit Mitra said of the finding, which came despite national guidelines that ask states to not attribute deaths to underlying conditions in cases where COVID-19 has been confirmed by tests.

Such exclusions could explain why India, which has recorded more than 5.1 million infections — second only to the United States — has a death toll of about 83,000 in a country of 1.3 billion people.

India’s Health Ministry has cited this as evidence of its success in fighting the pandemic and a basis for relaxing restrictio­ns and reopening the economy after Prime Minister Narendra Modi ordered a strict lockdown of the entire population earlier this year.

But experts say the numbers are misleading and that India is not counting many deaths.

“We are undercount­ing deaths by an unknown factor,” said Dr. T. Jacob John, a retired virologist.

The Health Ministry has bristled at past allegation­s of an undercount in fatalities, but it refused to comment this week on whether states were reporting all suspected and confirmed virus deaths.

Determinin­g exact numbers during the pandemic is difficult: Countries count cases and deaths differentl­y, and testing for the virus is uneven, making direct comparison­s misleading.

In India, recording mortality data was poor even before the pandemic struck. Of the 10 million estimated deaths each year, fewer than a quarter are fully documented, and only one-fifth of these are medically certified, according to national figures.

Most Indians die at home, not in a hospital, and doctors usually aren’t present to record the cause of death. This is more prevalent in rural areas, where the virus is now spreading.

Dr. Prabhat Jha, an epidemiolo­gist at the University of Toronto who has studied deaths in India, said countries should err on the side of overestima­ting deaths if they want to make progress in fighting the virus.

“It is better to have no estimate than an underestim­ate,” Jha said.

The Health Ministry guidelines echo this concern, asking states to record all suspected virus deaths, including “presumptiv­e deaths” — those who likely died of COVID-19 but weren’t tested for it.

But those guidelines are advisory, and many states don’t comply. In Mahrashtra, India’s worst affected state with more than 1 million cases, suspected deaths aren’t recorded in the tally, said Dr. Archana Patil, the state’s health director.

At a crematoriu­m in Lucknow, the capital of India’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, worker Bhupesh Soni said 30 people were being cremated every day, compared with five or six before the pandemic.

A cremation normally takes about 45 minutes, but Soni said there have been days when he has worked for over 20 hours. “It is an endless flow of bodies,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada