The Daily Courier

The Star Wars freedom dilemma

- NEIL ——— Neil Godbout is managing editor of the Prince George Citizen.

A young man wanders into the wrong part of town but is saved from attackers by the neighbourb­ood kook.

The crazy old fella takes the opportunit­y to fill the impression­able young man’s head with all sorts of crazy ideas, including a pile of quasi-religious mumbo jumbo about a now-defunct cult the old guy was part of with the young man’s dad. In short order, the young man is convinced to join a band of insurgents intent on civil war and overthrowi­ng the government. He goes on to kill thousands in a successful attack on a government military base.

That young man’s name is Luke Skywalker.

But is he a terrorist?

Based on the above summary of A New Hope, the first Star Wars movie from 1977, he seems to be.

When viewers first meet Luke, he’s an immature adolescent making a decent living working on his family’s farm and spending his free time shooting womp rats in

Beggar’s Canyon with his best pal Biggs.

He abandons this dull but peaceful life in favour of using extreme violence to bring freedom to a galaxy he knows nothing about beyond his upbringing on an isolated desert planet. He can’t wait to overthrow an empire that, while non-democratic and authoritar­ian, has brought a semblance of peace and order to most people, himself included.

He’s tempted to join the rebellion but his family responsibi­lity initially stops him (“I’ve got to get home… I can’t get involved… I’ve got work to do… there’s nothing I can do right now… it’s all such a long way from here.”). Only when he discovers Imperial storm troopers have murdered his aunt and uncle in the search for the missing droids does a grieving Luke side with old Ben Kenobi and join the rebellion.

Seen from this perspectiv­e, Skywalker is little more than an ignorant farm kid whose grief and desire for revenge are radicalize­d to serve an insurgency. The Force is presented to him as a moral and spiritual justificat­ion for his actions, positionin­g his enemies as cruel, inhuman soldiers under the spell of the dark side. If they won’t change willingly, they must die, casualties in a righteous and necessary war.

Does that make him any different from an ISIS recruit in Syria or Yemen?

But Skywalker isn’t a terrorist and a mass murderer, of course. He is a freedom fighter, a loyal friend and, we eventually learn, a devoted son willing to die in an effort to save his father’s soul.

And that military base he destroys is the Death Star, an interstell­ar weapon that had already been used to commit genocide, wiping out an entire planet and its inhabitant­s.

But it all depends on perspectiv­e, doesn’t it?

Applied to recent events much closer to home, the same perspectiv­e sheds light on the surge in extremist thought and behaviour.

Yellow Vest protesters see themselves as today’s Luke Skywalkers, awakened to the clear and present danger of Justin Trudeau selling out Canada to Quebec, to immigrants and to a new world order.

Qanon followers see themselves as real-life Princess Leias and Han Solos, battling urban, intellectu­al elites enslaving children for sex, controllin­g every aspect of modern life and selling out America to the Jews, the Mexicans and George Soros.

Calling these people racists and conspiracy theory quacks doesn’t shame them. It empowers them.

When Darth Vader and the Emperor mock him for refusing to accept his destiny and embrace the power of the dark side, he is not ashamed. He is empowered.

In the same way that Star Wars is far more about the personal struggles of its heroes (and the redemption of its central villain) than it is about a civil war, the Yellow Vesters and Qanon followers also see their struggle against the many perceived evils of modern society as deeply personal.

On one hand, it seems trivial to apply the themes and characteri­zations of Star Wars to complex and very real social forces. Yet it also shows how easily individual­s can insert themselves into the middle of a compelling and heroic narrative to give their lives meaning and purpose.

ISIS fighters are willing to fight and die for their cause, as are Luke and his friends.

Hopefully the Yellow Vest brigade, Qanon followers and other people with fringe beliefs stick to peacefully sharing their grievances at roadside protests.

Last month’s deadly siege at the U.S. Capitol, however, shows there are now some willing to take their battle to the next level, while ensnaring others in their bogus conspiraci­es and lies.

Right now, vaccines are politics. Canada’s federal government is taking a beating over not having enough of them right now. The provinces are bleating about supply – some provinces, anyway – after letting their own COVID-19 epidemics spiral into danger zones. And the feds dipped into a fund that is at least half-aimed at supplying poorer nations with vaccines. And so, were painted as desperate.

“Throughout there was an understand­ing that there would be moments of uncertaint­y, there would moments of delays and production challenges, as these companies scale up,” said Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Given that nobody even knew if these vaccines would work a year ago – and that the previous record for vaccine production was four years, with the mumps – that’s fair.

Sure. But we should be as specific as we can about what is going right, and what isn’t. The obvious problem is this: per capita Canada trails the U.S., the U.K, Israel – everybody is getting dusted by Israel – and much of Europe, sits 47th in the world in vaccinatio­ns per capita, and pronouncem­ents of failure are flying. Trudeau is saying Canada will still get the promised vaccines by the end of March, and every Canadian will be able to get vaccinated by September. He’ll be held to that.

The scoreboard stuff is expected. But if we’re going to have a vaccine bunfight, let’s be as clear as we can be without the feds actually making the contracts public. What could have been done differentl­y? Because that, and not the current scrapes, is the issue.

The scrapes matter. More vaccines in arms will save lives, and falling behind other nations means our pandemic will be worse. The bigger problem is that Quebec, Ontario, Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchew­an and to a far lesser extent B.C. let the virus roll through much of the second wave. For instance, once Ontario was finally forced to install something like a real lockdown to avoid completely destroying its hospital capacity, cases finally started to fall. Unlike with vaccines, there was a clearer road map, in the summer and September.

Still, more vaccines sooner should always have been the goal. And now, with Moderna and Pfizer reconfigur­ing factories, Canada has a case of the shorts.

So you get Canada dipping into the internatio­nal COVAX vaccine fund for 1.9 million doses by the end of June. Yes, South Korea is doing it, too, and Singapore, and

Argentina, and more. Yes, Canada is the number two contributo­r to the fund; yes, the fund is designed to be partly for your own vaccine supply, and Trudeau said half the money would go toward Canadian supply when it was announced, and the other half to the poorer countries in the world.

It still looks like Canada was short on supply and went to a cheque-cashing place to borrow against a poorer country’s income to get through the next couple weeks. It wasn’t hidden. That doesn’t make it feel right. We’d better donate a lot of vaccine to poorer countries, at some point.

So what went wrong earlier? If you say Canada was slow in procuring, it’s hard to explain that Canada was second on Moderna - Canada bought on Aug. 5, the EU on Nov. 24. Canada didn’t get guaranteed early runs of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines because the United States shovelled money into both companies, without which Moderna probably wouldn’t exist, and secured the first runs of both vaccines; 100 million, reportedly. So Doug Ford can talk about driving to Kalamazoo and being up someone’s yingyang so far with a firecracke­r, but the U.S. is closing in on half a million deaths. On vaccines, our alliance with America has as much value as a Trump Presidenti­al Library gift shop.

Well, what about Europe? The United Kingdom was fuelled by a gang outside government that managed to create a workable procuremen­t strategy, but then, the U.K. is not in Europe anymore. Of the countries ahead of Canada, most are European.

But the Europeans are in a slowdown, too, with complaints that an average of approximat­ely three per cent of citizens have been vaccinated, just above Canada’s 2.7 per cent. And even Israel, the world’s greatest vaccinatio­n story — and probably not coincident­ally, a country that understand­s something about facing existentia­l threats — is now slowing down and waiting until after the first quarter of the year for Moderna, and more Pfizer.

The slowdown is everywhere, so the difference appears to be in who got the most vaccine first. And for that, what could have been done differentl­y? Canada could probably have jumped on Pfizer earlier, though at that stage nobody knew which of the vaccines would work. Domestic manufactur­ing was examined, and deemed insufficie­nt. Maybe the feds were wrong.

So Canada, like most nations on earth, is behind the leaders, and it’s an agonizing wait. If Pfizer or Moderna run into more production problems, Trudeau’s promises will look empty. If they fail to deliver on their contracts at the end of Q1 — and the contracts are indeed quarterly — it seems unlikely any lever exists to change that. If the EU gets too desperate, things could get bad. A source familiar with those talks indicates nothing has been said to hint at that. But these are desperate times.

So you can’t say Canada has failed yet. The Liberals bet on every horse they could, and that strategy can still pay off.

“I think they held up their end of the bargain,” says Dr. Isaac Bogoch, infectious diseases specialist at the University of Toronto, and a member of the Ontario vaccine task force. “And I think we’ll see an explosion of vaccines on our doorstep in late March.”

There are the other bets — on Novavax, on Johnson & Johnson, on AstraZenec­a. The country should be able to vaccinate its entire long-term-care population by March, or even mid-February. There are 350,000 doses of Pfizer expected to land at Pearson in two weeks or so, and more after that, and the big supply in April, hopefully. Vaccines will come. In the meantime, politics.

But they’re not here now, so provinces should double down to protect against variants, and protect essential workers with paid sick leave because the federal benefit isn’t enough. The feds should work out more testing at the land border. They need to communicat­e in a far more open and transparen­t way. And everyone else should treat this like winter: we have to wait out the bad weather. When the second quarter arrives, let’s see how Canada does. Because that, more than anything, will be the test.

———

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada