The Daily Courier

Housing is life or death

For migrant farm workers, housing is not just a determinan­t of health, but a determinan­t of death

- By C. SUSANA CAXAJ and ANELYSE WEILER C. Susana Caxaj is an assistant professor of nursing at Western University and Anelyse Weiler is assistant professor of sociology at the University of Victoria. This column appeared on theconvers­ation.com

Imagine if, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic — before vaccines were available — you had to share a cramped bunkhouse with a dozen co-workers. Imagine if your employer forbid you from having personal visitors, or if you had to ask your boss for permission to visit the doctor.

Agricultur­al workers hired through the Temporary Foreign Worker Program regularly confront these dynamics while they leave their families behind in countries like Mexico and Jamaica for months or even years at a time to work in Canada. Frequently, they live on their employer’s property. These housing conditions are inconsiste­nt, often overcrowde­d and sometimes grossly substandar­d.

But this month, the federal government is holding a roundtable to improve migrant farm workers’ employer-provided housing. This is a crucial opportunit­y to tackle persistent problems.

COVID-19 revealed dangers of poor housing

When COVID-19 hit migrant farm workers disproport­ionately hard in 2020, many Canadians recognized the connection between farm workers’ poor housing and the avoidable health challenges they often face. Our own research shows housing conditions played a major role in the untimely death of several farm workers.

Policymake­rs are increasing­ly recognizin­g that housing is a significan­t determinan­t of health. But for migrant agricultur­al workers, housing is also a significan­t determinan­t of death.

Before the pandemic, agricultur­al industry groups pushed back against creating national housing standards for workers. The federal government commission­ed a study in 2018 by the National Home Inspector Certificat­ion Council, a non-profit organizati­on that certifies housing inspection credential­s. The study concluded that the quality of housing for migrant farm workers lacked uniformity, and the investigat­ors recommende­d standardiz­ed criteria.

Yet four years later, the government has made sluggish progress towards enforceabl­e national housing standards.

Key housing issues

Our research in British Columbia and Ontario, including interviews with over 50 migrant agricultur­al workers, identified several key housing issues:

1. Water, food and sanitation: Lack of access to clean drinking water and insufficie­nt toilets, showers and handwashin­g stations are common concerns raised by migrant workers. Inadequate refrigerat­ion, food storage and stoves were also often reported. This has serious consequenc­es for the type of food workers can cook and store, and their nutrition. Because of limited laundry, cooking and washroom facilities, some workers spend their days waiting in line for a turn at these basic amenities.

2. Heating, cooling and electricit­y: Some workers told us that on a cold winter’s night, they gather around a space heater or oven door to stay warm. In the summer heat, one worker told us that trying to sleep after a long shift is a “living hell” due to a lack of ventilatio­n and air conditioni­ng in the trailer he shares with another worker.

3. Exposure to pests, hazards and disrepair: The 2018 report commission­ed by the federal government found that 40 per cent of workers’ housing was reported by employers as “dual purpose.” This means living quarters also functioned as workplace facilities (for example, granaries, garages, etc.). This finding suggests many workers may live in close proximity to agricultur­al chemicals and other hazards, which echoes findings from previous research. Lack of maintenanc­e is also common.

4. Overcrowdi­ng and lack of privacy: One study reported the ratio of workers to functionin­g toilets on one farm was 45 to two. Echoing this research, overcrowdi­ng and cramped living quarters were among the most common complaints made by participan­ts in our own study. During COVID-19, these cramped living quarters amplified uncertaint­y and anxiety for workers. A lack of personal space also undermines workers’ basic need for privacy and intimacy. One interviewe­e noted, “you can’t even wish your wife a good night,” without someone overhearin­g.

5. Isolation and employer control: Migrant agricultur­al workers tend to live in rural areas far away from basic services and community activities outside of work (such as religious services). Recent farm worker deaths from motor vehicles point to the lack of public and safe active transporta­tion in workers’ neighbourh­oods. Workers have told us they may be required to bike one- or two-hour round trips to access services or participat­e in social events.

Workers also face explicit restrictio­ns on their freedom. Among the rules some workers are expected to conform to while living in Canada include curfews, prohibitio­ns on visitors and being locked into their living quarters. Workers are often hesitant to report illegal behaviours by their employer for fear it may put their livelihood­s in jeopardy.

Action to ensure safe housing

Migrant agricultur­al workers deserve to live with the same health, safety, and dignity owed to any Canadian worker. The federal government should take the following actions immediatel­y:

1. Consistent national housing standards. The federal government should co-ordinate among all levels of government so that workers no longer fall through the jurisdicti­onal cracks. Standards should be significan­tly raised for physical housing conditions (e.g., no bunk beds), health and safety, freedom from employer control and security of tenure.

2. Proactive, unannounce­d and thorough housing inspection­s to ensure standards on paper are enforced in practice. Workers need accessible channels to report problems while being protected from employer backlash, alongside the freedom to collective­ly organize. Penalties for non-compliance should be high enough to promote deterrence.

3. Government-funded housing (for example, in residentia­l areas, with safe transporta­tion to farms) would help promote inclusion and access to community services, while reducing inappropri­ate employer restrictio­ns or control.

4. Permanent residency, open work permits and a fair grievance procedure before facing deportatio­n would allow workers to refuse unsafe housing and poor work conditions, which often go hand-in-hand. A secure immigratio­n status would also give workers the option of bringing their families with them.

The federal government’s upcoming roundtable is an urgent opportunit­y to raise the bar on dignified housing and living conditions for these members of our communitie­s. Canada should stop expecting low-wage, racialized migrant workers to bear the brunt of preventabl­e illness and death.

 ?? The Canadian Press ?? Migrant farm workers were disproport­ionately affected by COVID-19 because of poor housing conditions.
The Canadian Press Migrant farm workers were disproport­ionately affected by COVID-19 because of poor housing conditions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada