The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Environmen­tal groups say $16K fine for pipeline spill not even slap on wrist

-

An energy company with a history of pipeline problems has been fined and warned by Alberta's regulator for a 2013 spill that sent millions of litres of salty water into the muskeg.

But environmen­tal groups say Apache Canada's $16,500 penalty isn't even a slap on the wrist.

“It's more like a wave in the general direction of a wrist,” Keith Stewart of Greenpeace said Tuesday.

Sometime during the first week in May 2013, an Apache pipeline in the Zama region of northern Alberta began to leak process water heavily contaminat­ed with salt. That leak continued until it had released 15 million toxic litres into the surroundin­g muskeg.

The company finally reported the leak to the regulator on June 1 of that year.

It was the latest in a series of problems for the company. The regulator reported 12 “highrisk enforcemen­t actions” between 2009 and 2013, most of which involved the release of hydrocarbo­ns or other fluids.

“The AER investigat­ion revealed that Apache lacked adequate procedures, training, communicat­ion, and supervisio­n that contribute­d to the failure to detect, evaluate, and take immediate action concerning the pipeline leak and subsequent release of produced water,” the regulator said in its report. Apache was fined on June 27. On Tuesday, the regulator ordered the company to hire an independen­t auditor to check how it maintains pipeline safety. The auditor's recommenda­tions must be in place by the end of the year. As well, Apache has until October to tell the regulator how it plans to prevent future releases.

Apache has already complied, the regulator said.

The regulator noted the $16,500 penalty was the maximum allowed under the law.

But Stewart pointed out the penalty amounts to about onetenth of a cent per litre.

That type of administra­tive fine isn't enough to deter companies from cutting corners, he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada